From the President: Now More Than Ever Sustainable Development Matters

Autumn 2009

Economic growth and environmental improvement are not mutually exclusive.

Throughout 2009, USCIB President and CEO Peter Robinson devotes this space to discussing the increased relevance of USCIB’s core values, principles and priorities.

Around the world, society faces the challenge of balancing two equally critical imperatives: on the one hand, economic growth and human progress; on the other, environmental sustainability and stewardship for future generations.  Some question whether these two imperatives can be met simultaneously.  Perhaps, they posit, balancing the economy and the environment is a zero-sum game, with improvements in one area coming at the expense of improvements in the other.

As a general rule, USCIB members do not buy in to the concept of zero-sum games, especially in this area.  We believe that environmental and economic progress can, and indeed must, go hand in hand.  Because of our unique positioning in the global policymaking sphere, we are now uniquely poised to press policy makers to put that belief to the test in the area of climate change.

This December, diplomatic efforts to develop a long-term international agreement to succeed the Kyoto Protocol will culminate in a major United Nations conference in Copenhagen.  Working primarily through the International Chamber of Commerce, USCIB is actively seeking a global framework that will provide energy access and security, while spurring technological innovation and the deployment of climate-friendly technologies to enable us to meet the common challenge of curtailing greenhouse gas emissions.

And this is not just our position.  As reported in an earlier issue of International Business, participants at a pre-Copenhagen business summit involving influential business groups from all the major emitting countries surprised even themselves with a remarkable degree of consensus around these key points.  Clearly, business is on board and will push hard for an effective global agreement on climate.

But one does need to wonder whether our elected officials feel the same sense of urgency.  It is worrisome that, in debating the establishment of a cap-and-trade mechanism for the United States, Congress is seriously weighing the imposition of “green” tariffs to punish those who may not live up to our own new standards.  This is precisely how one might wreck the chances for progress in Copenhagen.

Indeed, there is entirely too much talk of sticks, rather than carrots, in the climate debate.  There are clearly win-win opportunities in a post-Kyoto framework that would enable countries to grow economically while reducing emissions.  But we must keep markets open while fostering innovation.

American companies are up to the climate challenge, and indeed would benefit from lower barriers to imports of environmental technologies abroad.  The U.S. and other major governments in developed and developing countries must support the private sector’s proven ability to commercialize and disseminate the fruits of innovation.  Open trade is an essential part of that formula.

Sustainable development matters, perhaps even more so during a time of recession and scarce resources.  It is possible to secure global prosperity while protecting the world’s climate, but only with strong and sensible leadership from all major parties.  We hope that leadership to advance economic recovery and encourage greener solutions in a mutually supportive fashion will emerge between now and December.  The world can’t wait much longer.

Mr. Robinson’s bio and contact information

Other recent postings from Mr. Robinson:

Now More Than Ever: Open Markets Matter (Spring 2009)

Now More Than Ever: In the current crisis, USCIB’s core values matter even more (Winter 2008/2009)

An Energy Agenda for the Next Administration (Fall 2008)

Employers’ Vision of the ILO (Summer 2008)

From the President’s Desk: Now More Than Ever

Winter 2008/2009

In the current crisis, USCIB’s core values matter even more

By Peter M. Robinson

Peter M. Robinson
Peter M. Robinson

With the U.S. and global economies reeling from the effects of the worst financial crisis most of us have ever witnessed, we begin 2009 on a decidedly sober note.  So why am I feeling optimistic?

Perhaps because I subscribe to the view that every market downturn is a buying opportunity.  Or it could be that traditionally, in China, the Year of the Ox represents opportunity for those who are methodical, persistent and confident.

Whatever the reason, I remain optimistic that, despite the events of the past year, USCIB members, and our economy as a whole, will emerge from the current downturn more vibrant and competitive than ever.  But what must we do to get to that point?

Barack Obama’s historic election to the presidency has raised enormous hopes, both in the U.S. and overseas, for change and reform in a variety of areas, including the economy.  What will the new administration’s agenda, coupled with a strong Democratic majority in Congress, mean for global business?

Strong global institutions, and coordinated actions by governments, are essential as we address the fallout from the financial crisis and the downturn in the real economy.  In the process, international regulatory agencies may acquire new responsibilities impacting business.

Our economic troubles resulted from both bad choices by policy makers and missteps in the private sector.  Implementing meaningful regulatory reform, and getting us back on the path to growth, will therefore require leadership from both business and governments around the world.

All this points to the fact that an organization like USCIB has never been more important.  Promoting economic growth and better living standards, at home and abroad, through strong engagement by global companies with governments and international rule-making institutions – this is the heart of our work.  And it is work that must be done.

USCIB’s policy priorities during 2009 will be guided by our core values of international engagement and regulatory prudence in support of open markets, sustainable development, competitiveness and innovation, and corporate responsibility.  Now more than ever, these values matter. And the voices of USCIB and its members will matter – in Washington, Brussels, Beijing, Paris, Geneva, wherever policy makers gather.

Over the coming year, I will use this space to reflect further on these core USCIB values – why they matter, and what we and our partners around the world are doing to ensure business can help build a better world, for ourselves and our children.

So as we begin a new year, I wish to offer thanks for the invaluable contributions of our members, as well as the hard work of our staff, our colleagues at affiliated business bodies around the world, and our partners in government and civil society.  With your continued energy and support, we will all emerge from the current downturn stronger than we went in.

Mr. Robinson’s bio and contact information

Other recent postings from Mr. Robinson:

An Energy Agenda for the Next Administration (Fall 2008)

Employers’ Vision of the ILO (Summer 2008)

New Financial Challenges on the Horizon (Spring 2008)

Trade Can Save the Climate (Winter 2007-2008)

Now More Than Ever: Open Markets Matter

From the President’s Desk:

Now More Than Ever: Open Markets Matter

As the world debates new regulatory structures, USCIB will be there.

By Peter M. Robinson

Peter_Robinson
Throughout 2009, USCIB President and CEO Peter Robinson devotes this space to discussing the increased relevance of USCIB’s core values, principles and priorities.

The unfolding global financial crisis and worldwide recession have put open markets in jeopardy. According to the World Bank, since their summit in Washington last November, fully 17 of the G20 nations introduced some 47 new trade and related market barriers, despite pledges to avoid doing so.

The results are startling. The World Trade Organization estimates that world trade will plunge by nine percent this year, its sharpest decline since World War II. Lower worldwide demand is certainly contributing to this drop, as is the drying-up of credit, which has hit international trade just like it has every other sector of economic activity. But countries add insult to injury by pursuing such ruinous beggar-thy-neighbor policies.

What can business do to help get us out of this mess? Clearly, we must actively support close international cooperation to lift the major economies out of recession and to lay the groundwork for future prosperity. USCIB and our affiliated business groups have been pushing for this since the onset of the crisis. The results of the most recent G20 meeting in London appear to indicate that our leaders’ hearts are in the right place. But we need to hold policy makers to account.

Many countries have proposed new rules, even new international institutions, to deal with the fallout from recent market failures. New regulation is clearly necessary. But we must be alert to the real possibility of regulatory overreach, both at home and in the global arena. In particular, it is important that leading international bodies remain focused on their core competencies, and that the purpose of any new cross-border regulatory machinery be clearly defined.

USCIB’s global business network, with its strong links to key governments and international bodies, is playing an instrumental role in providing business with a clear, coordinated voice in major world capitals and intergovernmental forums.  Furthermore, we are seeking to bring a global perspective in support of open markets to domestic debates over trade, investment and economic recovery.

Following the G20 Summit in London, attention is expected to turn toward July’s G8 Summit in Sardinia. Our chairman Bill Parrett took part in April’s preparatory G8 Business Summit in Sardinia, where business federation heads from each of the G8 nations were expected to press for a strong and united policy response as well as the rejection of isolationist and discriminatory measures on the part of major governments.

Even in these difficult times, it is critically important for companies to remain engaged and provide necessary leadership in the fast-changing global business environment. Indeed, I would argue that such leadership is needed especially in difficult times, because in public policy, it is often during a crisis that important structural changes are made. What is decided this year may last for decades to come.

As the world debates new financial, economic and regulatory structures, USCIB will continue to serve as your vehicle for providing business solutions, vision and leadership. Because now more than ever, open markets matter.

Mr. Robinson’s bio and contact information

 

Other recent postings from Mr. Robinson:

Now More Than Ever: In the current crisis, USCIB’s core values matter even more (Winter 2008/2009)

An Energy Agenda for the Next Administration (Fall 2008)

Employers’ Vision of the ILO (Summer 2008)

New Financial Challenges on the Horizon (Spring 2008)

Some Thoughts on the Current Crisis

USCIB President Peter M. Robinson
USCIB President Peter M. Robinson

With developments changing on a daily basis, it is difficult to provide any sort of authoritative statement on the ongoing financial and economic crises sweeping the globe, or on the response of governments. But I would like to express our concern for the challenges facing all our members, as well as our determination to continue to serve your needs effectively in times of tighter resources.

As they wrestle with difficult decisions and a rapidly changing environment, global policy makers must be careful not to lapse into the failed approaches of the past. Overly heavy-handed regulation, especially through the imposition of protectionist policies that stifle trade and investment, has been tried many times in response to economic crises, and it has always failed. Indeed, it has usually made matters worse, most notably during the Great Depression. Governments need to be nimble, using smarter regulation (and, wherever possible, self-regulation) to spur recovery, employment, innovation and renewed economic growth. And they must coordinate their activities via existing international institutions.

I would like to reassure all USCIB members that, given the current challenges we all face, USCIB has continued its prudent financial management and developed contingency plans should conditions further deteriorate. As companies’ travel budgets tighten, we expect that our members will rely on USCIB more than ever to represent their interests at critical international negotiations – talks that most likely will be more contentious than ever.

Uncertain economic times, coupled with the onset of a new U.S. administration, will make USCIB and the values we espouse more needed than ever. The defense and promotion of market-based, open trade and investment regimes and well considered, appropriate regulation will be important elements of USCIB’s communication with the new administration and others throughout the difficult days ahead.

Peter M. Robinson

President and CEO, USCIB

Write to Mr. Robinson at probinson@uscib.org

 

From the President: An Energy Agenda for the Next Administration

The path to cleaner, affordable energy is through international cooperation

By Peter M. Robinson

Peter M. Robinson
Peter M. Robinson

The next administration will face a number of important international challenges requiring prudent and effective action.  Near the top on anyone’s list is energy and climate change.

Energy is the lifeblood of the global economy.  American business is a vital player in the production and transport of energy all over the world, and of course our society consumes more energy than any other nation.  We have made tremendous strides in developing cleaner technologies and energy sources, while improved efficiency has boosted our competitiveness as well as environmental protection.  Nevertheless, as a trip to the gas station will attest, energy costs are a challenge for everyone, including global companies.  Indeed, some say we may need to adapt to an era of permanently higher energy prices.

However, energy can never be seen as just a “business” issue.  Indeed, it is a fundamental prerequisite for social and economic development across a broad range of areas.  Pick almost any of the Millennium Development Goals – progress toward which is a key goal of this year’s UN General Assembly session – and you will find an energy-related component.  Clean water, health care, poverty eradication: how can any of these be effectively addressed without greater access to energy?

Of course, much of the debate over energy has focused on climate change.  What is the best path to a lower-carbon future?  And how can we best use our energy resources to mitigate and adapt to the effects of global climate change, while still ensuring we meet the needs of a growing world?  Global solutions are called for, and our next president will need to take the lead in crafting international rules to tackle both the energy and climate challenges.

For USCIB members and other global firms, the way forward is clear: the only way to provide dependable, affordable and cleaner energy is through international action and cooperation to deploy and upgrade energy systems worldwide.

We have worked hard to advance understanding of these issues at the highest levels, in global talks under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, where countries are seeking to forge agreement on broader and more inclusive post-2012 actions as the Kyoto Protocol reaches the end of its first round commitments, and in the G8 as well (see page 9).  We have leveraged our unique affiliations with the International Chamber of Commerce and the Business and Industry Advisory Committee to the OECD to advance a coordinated and integrated approach to climate and energy around the world.

There can be no doubt that American companies are up to the challenge.  The next administration must therefore frame a vision of U.S. leadership on energy and climate that places a high priority on our proven technological know-how and the business community’s ability to commercialize and disseminate the fruits of innovation.  This vision should be optimistic, driven by an understanding of the power of markets and international trade to deliver results.

A new vision on energy and climate should encompass four essential goals:

  • Broaden the energy mix. Diversifying energy portfolios is a proven strategy to manage tradeoffs and uncertainty in the near and long term.  We should not foreclose any energy options in international discussions.
  • Foster innovation. The transfer of new and cleaner energy technology to emerging markets such as China and India will be critical.  But to make this happen, private-sector innovation needs to be fostered, and intellectual property rights protected.
  • Embrace markets. The International Energy Agency puts the bill for meeting global energy needs over the next two decades at $20 trillion.  The lion’s share must come from the private sector.  To do this, we need open markets, protection for investments and trade liberalization.
  • Regulate wisely. We need long-term international policies, often called “enabling frameworks,” that are consistent and predictable, encouraging investment, securing property rights and promoting public-private partnerships for energy innovation.

The next administration must work closely with other nations, not just in established settings such as the UN, but in new arrangements that enable countries best placed to move forward to do so with a minimum of impediments.  It is a time for creative leadership, not dogma.

American business is ready to build our energy competitiveness in the global marketplace, to grow our economy and to move decisively towards a sustainable energy future.  We hope the next president is up to that same challenge.

For more information or to get involved, please contact USCIB’s Norine Kennedy  (212-703-5052, nkennedy@uscib.org).

Mr. Robinson’s bio and contact information

More on USCIB’s Environment Committee 

Other recent postings from Mr. Robinson:

Employers’ Vision of the ILO (Summer 2008)

New Financial Challenges on the Horizon (Spring 2008)

Trade Can Save the Climate (Winter 2007-2008)

From E-Commerce to the “Internet Economy” (Autumn 2007)

Employers’ Vision of the ILO Summer 2008

From the President’s Desk:

Focusing international labor policy on entrepreneurship and enterprise creation

By Peter M. Robinson

Peter M. Robinson
Peter M. Robinson

Globalization and the integration of international markets have been a tremendous benefit for the countries that have prepared themselves to take advantage of the new opportunities they provide. But for those countries that have failed to adjust or reform, these forces have exposed systemic failures in national governance that have in turn led to considerable social upheaval due to increased competition and changing labor markets.

Since social pressures can present a considerable barrier to maintaining or expanding international integration, a key policy challenge for international business is to develop effective mechanisms that can help countries reform their domestic policies to respond better to new external pressures. One such mechanism, the International Labor Organization (ILO) – the UN agency responsible for international labor and social policy – could play a leading role in this effort, and business is taking the lead to make it more responsive to employers’ needs.

Focusing on Current Needs

Abe Katz   At the IOE’s May General Council meeting in Geneva, USCIB President Emeritus Abe Katz officially concluded his two-year term as the IOE’s chairman, passing the baton to Prof. Wiseman Nkhulu of South Africa.  Mr. Katz noted the continuing relevance of the ILO to the conduct of international business, particularly at a time when the relationship between trade and labor standards has become an important political issue.  USCIB President Peter Robinson and Executive Vice President Ronnie Goldberg also hosted a dinner in honor of Mr. Katz attended by employer members of the ILO Governing Body, business and labor union representatives to the International Labor Conference, and senior U.S. government and ILO officials.  Many in attendance worked with Mr. Katz during his years as USCIB’s president (1984-98), when he served on the ILO Governing Body.  Toasts were made by numerous participants, including IOE Secretary General Antonio Peñalosa, IOE Executive Vice Chairman Daniel Funes de Rioja, International Trade Union Confederation Secretary General Guy Ryder, and ILO Director General Juan Somavia.  All reflected deep respect and admiration felt by colleagues from all sides. USCIB and its members have deeply appreciated Abe’s leadership over the past 24 years.
Abe Katz
At the IOE’s May General Council meeting in Geneva, USCIB President Emeritus Abe Katz officially concluded his two-year term as the IOE’s chairman, passing the baton to Prof. Wiseman Nkhulu of South Africa. Mr. Katz noted the continuing relevance of the ILO to the conduct of international business, particularly at a time when the relationship between trade and labor standards has become an important political issue. USCIB President Peter Robinson and Executive Vice President Ronnie Goldberg also hosted a dinner in honor of Mr. Katz attended by employer members of the ILO Governing Body, business and labor union representatives to the International Labor Conference, and senior U.S. government and ILO officials. Many in attendance worked with Mr. Katz during his years as USCIB’s president (1984-98), when he served on the ILO Governing Body. Toasts were made by numerous participants, including IOE Secretary General Antonio Peñalosa, IOE Executive Vice Chairman Daniel Funes de Rioja, International Trade Union Confederation Secretary General Guy Ryder, and ILO Director General Juan Somavia. All reflected deep respect and admiration felt by colleagues from all sides. USCIB and its members have deeply appreciated Abe’s leadership over the past 24 years.

The main challenge in making the ILO more effective and relevant for the business community is to focus its machinery on developing practical and workable solutions to current social and labor policy challenges. The global business community took a significant step forward in this area when the International Organization of Employers (IOE) – one of USCIB’s key international affiliates – produced an Employers’ Vision of the ILO, a comprehensive business agenda for the ILO.

Developed under the direction of Abe Katz (see box), the outgoing chairman of the IOE and USCIB’s president emeritus, the Employers’ Vision presents a clear agenda for the ILO that promotes entrepreneurship and enterprise creation, the main ways jobs are created and sustained. The vision also calls for increased attention on productivity improvements through education, skills development and training.

The IOE also calls for international labor standards that are practical and implementable.  Many existing standards set goals so impossibly high that few countries ratify them, and those that do so are unable to enforce them. Similarly, the IOE paper stresses that the ILO must help countries reform labor laws and other regulations that stifle enterprise creation and job growth, and which force operators into the ineffective and constraining informal economy.

International Business Leadership

Changing the ILO will not be easy or painless. A key reason for hope is that the ILO has a tripartite structure that is unique in the UN, meaning that employers and trade unions share voting power with the ILO’s member governments and participate in its oversight and management. USCIB Executive Vice President Ronnie Goldberg was recently re-elected to a second term on the ILO Governing Body.

On a broader level, USCIB relies on the IOE to coordinate international business engagement in the ILO. I was able to see the IOE in action at the annual International Labor Conference in June, when representatives of the IOE’s 145 national affiliates from 138 countries gathered in Geneva to speak on behalf on their business communities. The IOE is poised to build on the considerable achievements of Abe Katz in his term as IOE chairman under the new leadership of Professor Wiseman Nkuhlu, chairman of Pan African Capital Holdings of South Africa.

For more information or to get involved, please contact USCIB’s Adam Greene  (212-703-5056, agreene@uscib.org).

Mr. Robinson’s bio and contact information

More on USCIB’s Labor and Employment Committee

Learn more about the IOE

Other recent postings from Mr. Robinson:

New Financial Challenges on the Horizon (Spring 2008)

Trade Can Save the Climate (Winter 2007-2008)

From E-Commerce to the “Internet Economy” (Autumn 2007)

Business and Human Rights, Revisited (Spring 2007)

New Financial Challenges on the Horizon Spring 2008: Policy makers must come to terms with both sovereign wealth and subsidized takeovers

By Peter M. Robinson

Peter Robinson
Peter Robinson

Government-controlled investors – including sovereign wealth funds and state-owned enterprises – have gained a sizeable influence in international business and finance. The total value of sovereign wealth worldwide already amounts to several trillions of dollars, and it is expected to multiply many times over during the coming decade.

This raises unique public policy issues: sovereign investors may provoke national security concerns, spur fears of market volatility and financial instability, or generate protectionist pressure on governments. What to do? In recent months, USCIB has been an important forum for discussion of this and related issues.

A two-pronged approach

In February, at the Bank of New York Mellon’s Wall Street headquarters, Deputy U.S. Trade Representative John Veroneau spelled out for a USCIB audience how the United States is working closely with other countries, both those that make and those that receive sovereign investments, to anticipate and manage concerns over sovereign wealth funds.

Ambassador Veroneau explained that the U.S is working with major multilateral institutions – including the IMF and the OECD – to develop best practices for sovereign wealth funds, promote strong international standards of transparency and corporate governance, and maintain open, transparent, and non-discriminatory investment policies among all countries.

A new OECD report, prepared at the request of G-8 finance ministers, provides policy guidance for recipient countries. A complementary effort in the IMF aims to develop best practices of transparency and accountability for sovereign wealth funds. Together, these two projects are designed to build confidence in sovereign investment as a source of much-needed capital, to keep markets open and to resist financial and investment protectionism.

As I write this, we look forward to May 8, when Deputy Treasury Secretary Robert Kimmitt is scheduled to review progress on these and related issues with USCIB members in New York.

A related challenge

At the same time, the attention of policy makers is likely to turn to a related, but under-appreciated, issue: subsidized foreign takeovers of U.S. companies. What are the implications when a foreign company, backed by financial support from its home government, purchases a U.S. firm? And what actions should be taken to ensure a level playing field while maintaining fundamental market openness?

A new study from the United States Council Foundation, USCIB’s research and educational arm, investigates several recent cases of subsidized finance in cross-border M&A transactions, and suggests corrective measures that should be taken to head off the possibility of protectionist overreaction to subsidized investments. The paper, “Investment Subsidies for Cross-Border M&A: Trends and Policy Implications,” is authored by Gary Hufbauer and Thomas Moll of the Peterson Institute for International Economic, and Luca Rubini of the Birmingham Law School (UK).

According to Dr. Hufbauer, who detailed the report’s findings at the National Press Club in April, while subsidized M&A or non-transparent sovereign wealth dealings do not pose a “clear and present danger,” they merit thoughtful consideration well before a political confrontation occurs.

The study examines three recent instances where subsidized finance was seen or alleged to have played a significant role in an M&A transaction: the Chinese state-owned oil firm CNOOC’s bid for Unocal, the purchase of several Ingersoll-Rand divisions by Korea’s Doosan Infracore and moves by Electricité de France to expand into a number of new markets abroad.

Dr. Hufbauer and his co-authors contend that subsidized M&A, if not restrained by agreed international rules, might breed costly, wasteful emulation as well as protectionist sentiment in major markets – not least the United States – especially when viewed against the sensitivities raised by the growth in sovereign wealth funds.

Moving toward a new treaty

The appropriate response, they say, is to move toward a multilateral compact on M&A subsidies. Such a pact would be designed to increase government transparency, while drawing a line around what types of subsidies would spur review and limiting the types of retaliatory actions governments could use to counter subsidies. The authors suggest this year’s Group of Eight summit in Japan as an appropriate forum to begin discussions of such a multilateral agreement.

We believe this new study highlights an important issue for future consideration by USCIB members and the policy community. Together with our recent programs on sovereign investment, it is yet another example of the way USCIB can serve as your advance-warning mechanism, anticipating tomorrow’s issues today.

For more information or to get involved, please contact USCIB’s Rob Mulligan at (202) 682-7375 or rmulligan@uscib.org.

 

Mr. Robinson’s bio and contact information

More on USCIB’s Trade and Investment Committee

More on USCIB’s Financial Services Committee

Previous postings from Mr. Robinson:

Trade Can Save the Climate (Winter 2007-2008)

From E-Commerce to the “Internet Economy” (Autumn 2007)

Business and Human Rights, Revisited (Spring 2007)

The Internet’s Continued Growth Requires Careful Choices (Autumn 2006)

Securing the Promise of Nanotechnology (Summer 2006)

Making Progress in the Fight Against Fakes (Spring 2006)

Trade Can Save the Climate: Success in the Doha and Bali negotiations would be greater than the sum of the parts

By Peter M. Robinson

Peter M. Robinson
Peter M. Robinson

Apart from their seemingly mind-numbing complexity, the UN climate negotiations that took place in Bali in December, where nations began to map out a successor agreement to the Kyoto Protocol, would seem to have little in common with the Doha round of global trade talks. Indeed, they are rarely mentioned in the same breath.

This is disappointing. Freer trade and progress on climate change are both essential to sustainable development. International trade is a proven path to economic growth and technological advancement: as countries trade more, they grow richer and have more resources to devote to environmental protection. So both rich and poor countries have a clear stake in finding workable, mutually reinforcing resolutions to the Doha and Bali talks.

Free trade and environmental protection go hand in hand

What’s more, despite repeated predictions of imminent collapse, the Doha round is actually showing some signs of progress. Reaching a comprehensive agreement that lowers barriers to trade in both goods and services could positively influence the course of global climate policy. If both the Doha and Bali negotiations are successful, the result would be greater than the sum of the parts.

Conversely, if trade and climate are set against each another, the results would hamper economic growth, fuel protectionism and complicate the already difficult task of coming to a global consensus on protecting the climate. Even now, too many parties seem to want to use trade as a “hammer” to force countries to follow a specific path on reducing emissions of greenhouse gases. We must resist this temptation.

Nearly everyone involved in the climate talks agrees that innovative technologies are indispensable in both mitigating and adapting to climate change. China’s greenhouse gas emissions are expected to surpass those of the United States this year. It’s clear that the commercialization and dissemination of environmentally friendly technologies in rapidly developing countries like China and India is especially critical.

Needed: a technological pipeline

Most poorer nations understandably view the pursuit of economic growth as their right, and it is unlikely that they will agree to anything that places serious obstacles in their way. So far, they have resisted binding curbs on emissions, feeling this would constrain growth. But there already exist many cleaner-energy technologies and practices that could permit these countries to continue to pursue growth while contributing to a global reduction in emissions.

Many see a global price for carbon, set through an “artificial” market along the lines of European-style emissions trading, as the main catalyst for climate-friendly investment and technology. But far more important is freeing up the power of traditional markets to deliver green technologies where they are needed most.

A recent World Bank report found that removing tariffs and non-tariff barriers in 18 of the high-emitting developing countries for four basic clean energy technologies (wind, solar, clean coal and efficient lighting) could lower the costs of these technologies by some 13 percent, which could help reduce emissions significantly. What’s more, it is clear that these reductions could be further augmented through the application of better management practices and technical know-how, both of which tend to follow in trade’s wake.

A huge market for firms

Making sure climate and trade regimes are harmonious and mutually reinforcing would also open up vast opportunities for many multinational firms. The world market for environmental technologies is valued at $800 billion per year and growing. GE, United Technologies and many others are innovating, and they are looking to market and utilize their climate-friendly technologies in India, China, Brazil and other rapidly growing markets.

So more open trade could be what bridges the rich-poor divide on global warming and brings the world together, generating economic prosperity while protecting the climate.

To be politically viable, climate solutions must speak to real-world needs, including economic growth. They must be seen to deliver benefits today to people in both rich and poor countries. And they need to be in line with other political and market realities.

Among these realities is the desperate need to roll back tariffs on environmental goods and services, and halting calls for protectionist policies in the name of climate change. Completing the Doha round would set us on this path.

For more information or to get involved, please contact USCIB’s Norine Kennedy (212-703-5052, nkennedy@uscib.org).

 

Mr. Robinson’s bio and contact information

More on USCIB’s Environment Committee

More on USCIB’s Trade and Investment Committee

 

Previous postings from Mr. Robinson:

From E-Commerce to the “Internet Economy” (Autumn 2007)

Business and Human Rights, Revisited (Spring 2007)

The Internet’s Continued Growth Requires Careful Choices (Autumn 2006)

Securing the Promise of Nanotechnology (Summer 2006)

Making Progress in the Fight Against Fakes (Spring 2006)

From E-Commerce to the “Internet Economy”

From the President’s Desk:

By Peter M. Robinson

Peter Robinson
Peter Robinson

If you’re like me, in the last ten years you’ve probably gone through at least five or six laptops or personal computers, and a similar number of cell phones and mobile devices.  For a few people, trading up to the latest model can be a hassle.  For others, an opportunity.  For still others, an obsession (think iPhone).  But we all have to do it, to keep pace with the new features and services technology brings us.

Back in 1998, ministers from OECD member governments met in Ottawa with the heads of other international organizations, industry leaders and representatives of consumer, labor and social interests to discuss the emerging area of electronic commerce.  In what has come to be seen as a watershed event, participants sought to clarify their respective roles, discuss priorities, and develop plans to promote the development of global e-commerce.

At the time of the Ottawa ministerial, the Internet was still quite new for most of us, and e-commerce was viewed of as a distinct form of economic activity.  Ottawa’s success and lasting legacy were anchored in the forward-looking, high-level policy principles adopted there.  Indeed, it is those policy principles that have had an important role in the continued evolution of the Internet and its economic and social importance.

Since 1998, we have seen the development of a true “Internet economy” – a vast increase in access and participation on the web for social, creative and commercial purposes.  New applications have sprung up: the Internet is a platform for voice and data communications, computing, dissemination of video, social networking and an incubator for emerging business models.  It has become a key driver of innovation and a means for conducting all commerce – rather than a unique type of strictly “e-commerce.”

In 1998, we were moving from client server-based systems to Internet-based systems and witnessing the emergence of the Web as a commercial medium.  Now we are seeing the emergence of Web 2.0, which forms not just a significant business evolution but, perhaps more profoundly, a social revolution based on social networking.  This in turn is providing openings for entirely new business models.  IBM, for example, now holds business meetings in the popular Second Life platform.

How can we keep the innovative process moving forward, and broaden it to encompass more of the world?  These are questions the OECD will again take up, at next June’s ministerial in Seoul on “The Future of the Internet Economy.”  OECD members and other key actors – including high-level participants from the business community – will assess the state of the Internet economy and look forward to tomorrow’s challenges.

The Seoul ministerial will focus on three key themes: convergence, of networks, of technological platforms, and of business models; creativity, including support for innovation, cultural diversity and freedom of expression; and confidence, including measures to build trust and security on the Internet, while ensuring its continued accessibility for the data flows that fuel commerce and so many other activities.

Business will have a number of opportunities to interact ministers and other top officials, including at a BIAC-sponsored stakeholder meeting, ministerial roundtables and various social events.  Ministers from several non-OECD member states (including Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa as well as Indonesia, Malaysia, Egypt, Chile, Israel, Singapore, Thailand and Senegal) will also be invited.

USCIB, through close cooperation with the U.S. government and BIAC, has sought to encourage the OECD to build upon the success of Ottawa.  Strong company representation in Seoul is essential to ensure continued adherence to the fundamental policy and regulatory principles that have fostered the Internet’s remarkable growth in the past decade.

Carefully crafted policy and regulatory frameworks will ensure that the Internet – and the applications, businesses and services that operate over it – can continue to flourish in the coming decade as well, so that people everywhere can participate more fully in our increasingly integrated global society.

Mr. Robinson’s bio and contact information

More on USCIB’s Information, Communications & Technology Committee

 

Previous postings from Mr. Robinson:

Business and Human Rights, Revisited (Spring 2007)

The Internet’s Continued Growth Requires Careful Choices (Autumn 2006)

Securing the Promise of Nanotechnology (Summer 2006)

Making Progress in the Fight Against Fakes (Spring 2006)

What makes all this innovation possible?  A lot of things have contributed to the rapid development of information technologies and the Internet these past ten years.  One key factor has been good policy choices on the part of governments, many of which have opted wisely not to inhibit the growth of Internet-enabled innovation.  And a crucial forum for discussing Internet policy options has been the OECD.

Business and Human Rights Revisited

By Peter M. Robinson

Peter M. Robinson
Peter M. Robinson

It’s no secret that many global companies must contend, often on a daily basis, with the challenges of doing business in countries and regions where respect for human rights may be severely lacking.

A year ago, we reported on a planned United Nations study examining the responsibilities of the business community in promoting and protecting human rights.  The UN recently released its second report on the issue, supporting many of USCIB’s positions in what has become a highly contentious debate.  In a nutshell: business can and should contribute to the protection of human rights, but companies cannot take the place of governments in providing essential legal protections.

The contents of the UN report – the focus of speculation among both companies and NGOs, many of whom hold that business must be held responsible for implementing and enforcing human rights laws – offered somewhat of a mixed assessment.  The answer, it seems, is a mixture of the business view and a third option, which the UN terms “shared responsibility.”

The report is the official submission of Harvard professor John Ruggie, the UN’s special representative to on business and human rights, to the new UN Council on Human Rights.  It presents his findings to date and was presented to the council on March 28in Geneva.

On the central question of the role of governments versus companies, the report states quite clearly that “the State duty to protect against non-State abuses is part of the very foundation of the international human rights regime.”  In other words, governments cannot simply shift their responsibilities to companies and must implement and enforce their human rights laws.

On the question of whether companies are liable under international human rights conventions, Professor Ruggie states: “It does not seem that the international human rights instruments discussed [in the report] currently impose direct legal responsibilities on corporations.”  This question has been hotly debated between the business community and many NGOs for the past few years, and while it is unlikely to resolve the issue completely, this conclusion does help to focus the debate on more constructive issues.

The report recognizes the value of partnerships and other voluntary initiatives in bringing a range of actors together – business, governments and NGOs – to address particular problems or concerns.  It is this results-oriented approach that presents the greatest potential for success in this area.

Importantly, Professor Ruggie has been open to dialogue with business and NGOs alike.   The three main pillars of USCIB’s global network – the International Chamber of Commerce, the International Organization of Employers, and the Business and Industry Advisory Committee to the OECD – collaborated on a joint submission to Professor Ruggie on the role of business in failed states.

For more information or to get involved, contact USCIB’s Adam Greene (212-703-5056, agreene@uscib.org).

Mr. Robinson’s bio and contact information

More on USCIB’s Corporate Responsibility Committee

UN website

 

New postings from Mr. Robinson appear quarterly.  Previous postings:

The Internet’s Continued Growth Requires Careful Choices (Autumn 2006)

Securing the Promise of Nanotechnology (Summer 2006)

Making Progress in the Fight Against Fakes (Spring 2006)