USCIB Promotes Investment and Responsible Business in a Reforming Myanmar

MyanmarAs Secretary of State John Kerry recently noted in a speech prior to meetings between the United States and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), Myanmar has made significant strides toward reform in recent years that have created opportunities for foreign investment.

USCIB has stepped up its advocacy for business in Myanmar, particularly on issues related to investment and responsible business practices. Here are some updates of our work in a country that awaits significant investment opportunities if political reforms continue.

International Labor Organization Action

In July, USCIB convened a high-level meeting in Washington, D.C. with the International Labor Organization, several U.S. government agencies (State Department, Department of Labor and U.S. Trade Representative) and representatives from U.S. civil society and unions to address responsible investment in Myanmar. USCIB and its affiliate network, the International Organization of Employers, also have excellent contacts on the ground through the long serving ILO Myanmar representative, Steve Marshall. Until the recent opening in Myanmar, Marshall was the only UN official posted there. He has extensive contacts with the regime and deep knowledge of the unique dynamics businesses face on the ground.

At the end of July, the Myanmar Parliament passed into law ILO Convention No. 182 on the Worst Forms of Child Labor, which the country ratified this past December. The law will ban child labor and calls for the immediate elimination of the worst forms of child labor, including slavery, trafficking, the use of child soldiers in armed conflict and child prostitution. The Labor Minister announced recently that implementation of the convention will start in December 2014.

“Much of the progress in Myanmar on labor issues is the result of sustained pressure since 1999 by the ILO, with the support of employers, to get the government to amend its law and practice, which ultimately resulted in expanded ILO technical assistance on forced labor and freedom of association, including a substantial ILO presence on the ground in Myanmar,” said Ariel Meyerstein, USCIB’s vice president of labor affairs, corporate responsibility and governance. The ILO is currently advising on the reform of many of Myanmar’s labor laws, an essential aspect of revamping its economy that will enable increased foreign investment there by U.S. companies.

U.S. Company Best Practices Bearing Fruit

Building upon these exiting reform efforts and the momentum from the July high-level meeting in Washington, U.S. Trade Representative Michael Forman visited Myanmar in late August to conclude an agreement with the Republic of Myanmar to begin a consultative process intended to lead to a new Initiative to Promote Fundamental Labor Rights and Practices in Myanmar by the time of the ASEAN Leaders meeting in November, 2014. According to USTR’s press release, other interested governments, as well as businesses and labor stakeholders, will be invited to take part in the development and implementation of the Initiative, whose main goals will be to develop a multi-year strategy for labor law reform and capacity building, to implement fundamental labor rights and decent working conditions on the ground, and to foster strong relations between businesses, workers, and the government of Myanmar.

There is also some evidence that local companies are absorbing the responsible business practices of U.S. companies – albeit slowly. The Myanmar Center for Responsible Business published the results of its transparency survey, which documented the transparency practices of Myanmar companies. The study found that nine of the largest Myanmar companies publish a significant amount of information about their policies, standards and practices on responsible business conduct, but that 25 of the 60 large companies are not at all transparent and have no websites. A number of other companies publish only a little information, generally relating to anti-corruption or organizational transparency. Companies scored fewest points in the areas of human rights, including land acquisition, a major concern to the Myanmar population.

As reforms continue on the ground in Myanmar, USCIB is supporting further investment opportunities for U.S. and other foreign companies as well as the application of more responsible business practices at all levels.

Staff contact: Ariel Meyerstein

More on USCIB’s Corporate Responsibility Committee

In Memoriam

It is with deep regret that USCIB marks the untimely passing of two former USCIB Trustees, Jim Schiro and John Akers, leaders of successful international businesses.

Jim Schiro, 68, was chief executive of PricewaterhouseCoopers and Zurich Financial Services, and a lead director at Goldman Sachs. While at PwC, Schiro served as a USCIB Trustee and as a member of USCIB’s board of directors. He also oversaw USCIB finances as treasurer and chairman of the Finance and Oversight Committee. Peter Robinson, USCIB president and CEO, noted: “We greatly appreciated the opportunity to work with Jim—a good-natured, smart leader who kept us on our toes in a supportive way.”

John F. Akers, 79, became IBM’s sixth chief executive in 1985 and chairman a year later. In addition to serving as a Trustee, Akers was the 1989 recipient of USCIB’s annual International Leadership Award.  Robinson recalled that “Even at a challenging time of change for the computing industry, John was one of those senior business executives who dedicated themselves on behalf of American and global business to extracurricular service in championing open trade and investment policies.”

They will be missed, and our thoughts are with their families.

Host an International Exchange Student Sponsored by the US State Department

4817_image002The United States Department of State is sponsoring an International Exchange Student program, which provides host families an opportunity to develop their cross-cultural skills, which are critical in today’s globalized business environment.

Hosting an exchange student not only changes a student’s life in a meaningful way, but also has a great impact on the host family.  Almost 2,000 high school students representing over 50 countries are awarded highly competitive merit-based State Department scholarships to study in the United States each academic year.

These promising young leaders live with American host families across the county, attend high school, participate in extracurricular and community service activities, and give back to their host communities. These exchange students arrive as strangers, but leave as family.  One
host mom remarked, “We are honored to have such an incredible person as an exchange student.  She delights us with her wit, grace, and kindness every day.  Inviting her into our home has been one of the best things we have ever done.”

The benefits of hosting an exchange student go beyond simply welcoming someone new into your family’s life and sharing American culture, values, and traditions – when you host an exchange student you welcome a new culture, a new language, and all the richness that comes with it into your home.  Your family will be able to experience the world from the comfort of your own home, while showing a new life and culture to a student eager to see it.  Learn more at http://hosting.state.gov.

USCIB Provides Industry Input to UN FAO Nutrition Action Plan

4816_image001Global hunger and malnutrition remain stubbornly high, with over two billion people suffering from nutrient deficiencies. To address worldwide undernourishment, the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) spearheaded the 1992 International Nutrition Conference aimed at alleviating hunger and malnutrition while encouraging countries to develop national strategies to address unhealthy diets, obesity and other nutrition-related diseases.

The Second International Nutrition Conference (ICN2) will take place this November, and in the lead-up to the conference the FAO released a draft of its Framework for Action, a 10-year plan of action meant to provide key priorities to governments and other stakeholders for improving people’s nutrition in a sustainable way.

USCIB has participated in the FAO consultation on the framework, and on Monday released comments responding to the framework’s language which will be the basis for adopting major policy guidelines and strategies and for developing and updating national plans of action and investments to improve nutrition.

“USCIB appreciates the opportunity to provide input to the FAO consultation and believes it is essential that all stakeholders work together to develop a global food system to further improve people’s nutrition in a sustainable way,” said Helen Medina, USCIB’s senior director of product policy and innovation.

However, USCIB identified several problems with the draft’s language, particularly clauses that either ignore or downplay industry’s contributions to alleviating malnutrition, no definitions about vague terms such as “nutrition justice” and “highly processed foods of minimal nutritional value,” a tone that implies that trade and investment is bad for developing countries, and a failure to recognize that self-regulation with regard to the food and beverage industry has been beneficial.

Acknowledge Industry’s Role in Addressing Global Malnutrition

USCIB found that the framework draft in general contained limited language that acknowledged the food industry’s importance and the need for multilateral organizations to engage industry as a full partner in deciding strategies and common goals for addressing malnutrition. Industry is also keen on underscoring the importance of employing “knowledge and evidence-based programs” to combat global hunger and nutrition-related diseases.

Define Vague Terms

USCIB noted that the phrase “nutrition justice” isn’t defined and that the boundaries of the concept are unclear. USCIB recommends removing the term and instead focus the document on the action steps required to achieve explicit nutrition targets. The same critique was made of the term “highly processed foods of minimal nutritional value.” Medina wrote “The lack of either a definition or an evidence base linked to those definitions, should dictate that this statement is not appropriate for inclusion in the WHO/FAO Framework For Action document.”

Similarly, USCIB took issue with the framework’s priority actions for nutrition governance, arguing that there is a lack of clarity “as to how all these platforms, mechanisms, processes and reporting relate to similar activities either in place or proposed by WHO and the UN” and that “There appears to be significant potential for redundant, duplicative and overly burdensome processes that could present significant obstacles to achieving real progress.” USCIB noted that the framework should spell out what the roles and responsibilities among the various multi-lateral organizations involved in addressing global malnutrition.

Be Wary of Tax Incentives

Because fiscal policy is complex and often has unintended consequences, USCIB expressed caution with regard to plans to use taxes as incentives for healthy diets. USCIB argued tax rates should be kept low on food, especially for low-income individuals who spend a larger portion of their paycheck on food.

International Trade and Investment Isn’t Bad

Regarding the framework’s language on trade and investment in agriculture, Medina wrote, “There appears to be a presumption underlying this section that the impact of trade and investment is primarily negative, despite the fact that no evidence is offered to support this presumption and despite significant evidence to the contrary, including FAO and WTO reports, indicating that increased trade, particularly in agriculture and food, increases the standard of living in developing countries and improves the performance of national economies.  This section continues this presumption with respect to trade and nutrition specifically, not by providing any evidence of harm, but by implication simply constructing each proposition in the negative.  Without any science or evidence basis, this entire section should be reconsidered.”

Support Nutrition Education and the Role of Women

USCIB agrees with the framework that nutrition education is key to addressing global malnutrition, and that all stakeholders must work together to effectively educate consumers through labeling and nutrition programs on food.

USCIB also agrees that empowering women is crucial for improving nutrition, and therefore promotes policies that help women become farmers, traders and business owners.

“The private sector believes it is essential that all stakeholders work together to develop holistic, impactful and sustainable solutions,” said Medina. “We are committed to public-private partnerships that support public health strategies.”

Staff contact: Helen Medina

More on USCIB’s Food and Agriculture Committee

More on USCIB’s Product Policy Working Group

Trade Facilitation in Asia

Kristin Isabelli (far right) moderated a workshop on chokepoint 8 titled “Lack of Regional Cross-Border Customs-Transit Arrangements.”
Kristin Isabelli (far right) moderated a workshop on chokepoint 8 titled “Lack of Regional Cross-Border Customs-Transit Arrangements.”

Government and private-sector representatives convened in Beijing for the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Senior Officials’ Meetings throughout August to discuss how to support sustainable economic growth and prosperity in the Asia-Pacific region.

USCIB participated in a number of meetings regarding customs matters. Kristin Isabelli, director of Customs and Trade Facilitation, moderated a workshop on chokepoint 8 and the private sector’s vision on the benefits of implementing proposed guidelines that would streamline cross-border trade among APEC economies. USCIB also participated in meetings that allowed business to weigh in on APEC chemicals regulation.

Chokepoint 8 addresses the lack of the lack of regional, cross-border customs transit arrangements between third party non-APEC countries. When goods transit through third party countries as they travel from one APEC country to another, there is currently no way to track the goods. Each country requires different documentation for the goods in transit, which makes moving goods more time-consuming and expensive for business. The goal of the proposed chokepoint 8 guidelines is to streamline and harmonize the required documentation, promote harmonized border transit agreements among economies and eliminate the need to undergo customs for cross border customs transit.

Isabelli’s panel addressed the lack of transit arrangements and customs harmonization in the APEC region and allowed the private sector to discuss some of the infrastructural, logistic, technological and capacity-building issues that hamper the smooth flow of goods and services between APEC economies. Businesses support the establishment of regional cross-border transit arrangements that would slash red tape at customs, enhancing efficiency throughout the supply chain and facilitating trade and economic growth. Securing such agreements requires the collaboration of all APEC economies.

This year’s third APEC Senior Officials Meetings also marked the first meeting of the customs public private sector virtual working group, of which Isabelli is the private sector co-chair. The meeting convened members of the business community, including Ralph Carter (FedEx), and customs officials to discuss a list of priorities that would complement the work of the APEC Subcommittee on Customs Procedures (SCCP), including e-commerce, single window – a system whereby traders can submit regulatory documents to a single location –and trusted trader programs. The subcommittee’s objectives are to simplify and harmonize regional customs procedures to ensure that goods and services move efficiently and safely through the region.

Staff contact: Kristin Isabelli

More on USCIB’s Customs and Trade Facilitation Committee

More on USCIB’s APEC Working Group

Chemicals Regulation Top-of-Mind at APEC Senior Officials Meeting

LR: Hitoshi Nanimoto (Japan), Dusanka Sabic (Australia), Andy Liu (DuPont), Erica Logan (ITIC), Sophia Danenburg (Boeing)
LR: Hitoshi Nanimoto (Japan), Dusanka Sabic (Australia), Andy Liu (DuPont), Erica Logan (ITIC), Sophia Danenburg (Boeing)

The chemicals trade cuts across multiple industries and contributes to the production of thousands of different products, from pharmaceuticals to computer microchips. Central to the modern economy, chemicals and products they are used in are traded widely across borders. And because they add value to so many different consumer goods, chemicals are a staple economic building block for the member countries of the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum.

The regulation of chemicals trade was top-of-mind during this year’s third APEC Senior Officials Meeting (SOM III) hosted in China, where government regulators met with industry representatives and other stakeholders to discuss opportunities and challenges in the chemicals industry.

Helen Medina, USCIB’s senior director of product policy and innovation, attended SOM III along with a number of member company executives. The meetings took place under the auspices of the APEC Chemical Dialogue, a forum for regulatory officials and industry representatives seeking to advance regulatory dialogue on chemicals trade and achieve environmental protection while minimizing costs to business.

During an industry “pre-meeting,” private-sector representative from the APEC region met to discuss business priorities on chemicals regulation. Of concern to industry included ongoing issues related to EU REACH, such matters related to polymers and the criteria for identifying endocrine disruptors. The APEC region is also increasingly a concern for industry given all the changes in the chemical management systems in China, Korea and Chinese Taipei. Industry is concerned about Confidential Business Information (CBI), and is keen on protecting trade secrets. Business supports striking the right balance between health safety and the protection of intellectual property rights, and to that end industry is backing the implementation of the 2008 Best Practice Principles on chemicals regulation in the APEC economies.

USCIB also convened an industry meeting with officials from the U.S. State Department and USTR. The meeting provided an opportunity for business to show that a wide range of industry sectors are involved in the APEC Chemical Dialogue – companies represented at the meeting included DuPont, American Petroleum Institute, Boeing, the Information Technology Industry Council, the American Chemistry Council, the Nickel Institute and others. The meeting also gave industry a chance to discuss priority issues such as regulatory cooperation and CBI. Industry also noted that chemical regulations shouldn’t disrupt the availability of certain irreplaceable chemicals needed for specialized industries.

Joint Meeting of APEC Regulators’ Forum and OECD New Chemicals Clearing House

USCIB’s Medina also participated in the joint meeting of the APEC Regulators’ Forum with the OECD Clearing House on New Chemicals, which brings together officials from the U.S., Canada and Australia and industry representatives to craft ways to reduce the costs on business associated with new chemical notification reviews while ensuring a high quality of health and safety decisions for new chemicals.

APEC economies provided updates on their chemical management systems, with OECD countries sharing best practices to help developing countries build up their chemical management systems. For example, New Zealand developed a toolbox to help small businesses deal with hazardous substances, and the United States spoke about Environmentally Preferable Purchasing, a program that allows the federal government to buy green products, stimulating market demand for environmentally friendly products and services. The OECD also presented its work on a toolbox that supports the evaluation of alternatives when safer chemical substitutes are sought.

The Regulators’ Forum gives business the opportunity to obtain an overview of the chemical management systems in the APEC economies and how planned changes could impact business. It also gives industry a chance to interact with regulators, as well as learn about what chemicals programs advanced economies are promoting.

Serving as a place where governments can share information about new chemicals going to market, the Clearing House is beneficial to business because companies don’t have to regenerate information about new chemicals. Instead, companies go to one place – the OECD Clearing House – for chemicals evaluation, and then put those chemicals on the market in different countries.

The Clearing House is actively working to include more participants from non-OECD countries in its activities. Since many APEC economies are in the process of updating or creating new chemical management systems, APEC regulators have much to gain from discussions with the OECD Clearing House.

“Our hope is that both APEC economies and industry see the value of the OECD Clearing House on New Chemicals,” Medina said.

Workshop Advances Best Practices on Chemicals Regulation

On Tuesday USCIB’s Medina attended the APEC Chemical Dialogue Regulatory Cooperation Workshop. The purpose of the workshop is to advance the implementation of the 2008 Principles for Best Practice Chemical Regulation and to contribute to APEC’s ongoing efforts to promote regulatory cooperation. USCIB members featured prominently on the agenda and were able to communicate their specific perspectives on why regulatory cooperation is important.

Andy Liu of DuPont gave one industry’s view on the importance of having risk based decision making practices. “We believe risk-based assessments and oversight of chemicals most effectively protect the public and the environment,” said Liu. “Proportionality of oversight and efficient use of available resources by screening, prioritizing, and only generating data that are necessary for decision-making can help stakeholders to minimize risk of chemicals and allow investment in innovations necessary for a brighter future.”

Liu also highlighted the importance of protecting confidential business information so that companies can continue to innovate and bring sustainable solutions to society. While implementing the Globally Harmonized hazards classification and labeling systems in a more consistent manner would lessen the costs to the business.

Participants also heard from Erica Logan, ITIC whose main message was that the electronics industry is leveraging an internationally recognized International Electrotechnical Commission standard to manage relevant Chemicals in Products information throughout the supply chain. “We encourage governments to recognize the value of such standardized approaches for managing chemical information and risk,” said Logan.

Sophia Danenberg of Boeing gave another downstream users perspective. She noted that chemical management systems do impact the aerospace industry and that regulators should consider how chemical regulations impact the availability of high specialized chemicals for use in the aerospace industry.

On a related note, Don Wilke, P&G, talked about principles for substance evaluation and the benefits for having a regulatory framework that allows or encourages the use of analogues and other surrogate data in chemical assessments. Use of analogues reduces animal use, costs and can provide for higher tier information sooner.

“The appropriate use of chemical analogues and read-across information can significantly reduce the unnecessary use of animals in safety testing as well as reduce the costs and the time required for testing,” said Wilke. “This is in line with the Chemical Dialogue Best Practice Principles of efficiency, flexibility and science-based decision making.”

More information about the workshop and its conclusions are forthcoming.

Staff contact: Helen Medina

More on USCIB’s APEC Working Group

More on USCIB’s Product Policy Working Group

ICC Helps APEC Streamline Ad Standards

BeijingGovernments and business representatives from the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) economies convened to discuss self-regulatory best practices in the advertising industry at the APEC Advertising Standards Forum and Mentoring Workshop in Beijing last week.

The workshop focused on best practice advertising regulation with a view to aligning advertising standards across APEC markets, reducing barriers to trade from diverse regulations and promoting quality standards. The event was hosted by the Chinese Association of National Advertisers and the Australian Advertising Standards Bureau.

The workshop built upon the insights of a recent APEC Policy Support Unit study, which noted the use of the Consolidated International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) Code of Advertising and Marketing Communications Practice as the globally accepted best practice principles.

The ICC Code, developed by the ICC Commission on Marketing and Advertising, is the gold standard for most nationally applied self-regulation around the world. It offers a globally consistent baseline for economies developing advertising principles while also providing flexibility for local laws and culture to be reflected in a local code.

The APEC workshop, coming on the heels of the successful launch and advocacy event of the first Mandarin translation of the ICC Code, also provided an occasion to announce the creation of a local Commission on Marketing and Advertising by ICC China. This ICC Commission will work with industry and other key stakeholders to help advocate the benefits of advertising self-regulation and ensure local input is given into the global Commission that writes and revises the ICC Code.

More at ICC’s website.

USCIB is ICC”s American affiliate.

Staff contact: Jonathan Huneke

More on USCIB’s Marketing and Advertising Committee

Junior Chamber Summit Highlights Youth Role in Economic Development

Torino 2015 World Chambers CongressMore than 500 young professionals met with business, civil society and government leaders to discuss how to solve challenges encountered by today’s youth at this year’s Junior Chamber International (JCI) Global Partnership Summit, which took place July 23-25 in New York City.

The summit marks 30 years of cooperation between the International Chamber of Commerce, JCI and the World Chambers Federation (WCF) – a specialized division of ICC encompassing chambers of commerce from every region of the world. USCIB is ICC’s American affiliate.

During the event, Cynthia Duncan, USCIB’s senior vice president for Carnet and Trade Services, and chair of the World ATA Carnet Council, spoke about the dynamic cooperation between JCI and WCF on a wide range of initiatives.

She called on JCI members to continue supporting ICC and G20 efforts to foster education and entrepreneurship, and she urged the new generation of leaders to formulate and advocate policy proposals that will “contribute to a sustainable global economy and reduce youth unemployment.”

Focusing on the role of young active citizens and their contribution to the post-2015 global development process, the conference aimed to provide young professionals with the tools and information necessary to impact their communities through targeted action and strategic partnerships.

More at ICC’s website.

Every two years, WCF organizes the World Chambers Conference, the only global gathering of chambers of commerce from around the world. The 9th World Chambers Congress will take place in Torino in June 2015.

Staff contact: Cynthia Duncan

Global Apprenticeship Network Makes Strides Against Youth Unemployment

Youth EmploymentFounded last year in response to the global youth unemployment crisis, the Global Apprenticeships Network (GAN) is a coalition of companies that offers apprenticeships to young workers and shares youth employment best practices with other companies and labor administrations.

Developed jointly by USCIB’s affiliate networks – the International Organization of Employers and the Business and Industry Advisory Committee to the OECD – the GAN aims to create job opportunities for young people and ensure that businesses can tap employees with the right skills for the future.

Last week, the GAN took an important step forward by becoming an independent non-profit Swiss association. The IOE appointed José María Álvarez-Pallete, Chief Operating Officer of Telefónica, as the network’s chairman.

“I am honoured to take on the role of chair of the GAN and very committed to leading this association,” said Álvarez-Pallete. “Our vision is that corporations – big and small – can work together to address the difficult education-to-work transition faced by young people when they access the labor market.”

The GAN is committed to advocating work readiness programs by sharing best practices, establishing GAN National Networks with employer federations and developing practical toolkits.

Read more on the IOE website.

Staff contact: Ariel Meyerstein

More on USCIB’s Labor and Employment Committee

India’s Mandate Will Require Firms to Spend 2 of Profits on CSR

Last year the Indian government passed the Indian Companies Act, a law which went into effect on April 2014 requiring Indian companies to contribute 2 percent of their annual profits to social and charitable causes.

India’s Ministry of Corporate Affairs recently released a circular that clarifies which companies fall under the law’s purview, as well as what qualifies as a corporate social responsibility (CSR) contribution.

Companies worth more than $80 million will be required to establish a CSR committee that formulates a CSR policy to contribute at least 2 percent of profits to causes such as the eradication of extreme poverty and hunger, the promotion of gender equality and education, environmental sustainability and government-run funds for socio-economic development such as the Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund. The Indian Companies Act also states that companies that refuse to comply must explain their reason for doing so in their annual financial statements.

India’s CSR mandate, often referred to as the “2 percent requirement,” makes India the first country in the world to require that qualifying companies make obligatory corporate social responsibility expenditures.

Key Aspects of India’s Corporate Social Responsibility Mandate Clarified (India Briefing)

Staff contact: Ariel Meyerstein