Business Weighs in on UN Treaty Process on Business and Human Rights

Photo credit: UN, Pierre Albouy
Photo credit: UN, Pierre Albouy

As the United Nations Human Rights Council begins work on a legally binding treaty aimed at regulating transnational enterprises with respect to human rights, USCIB’s global network published a position paper representing the views of international business on the UN treaty process.

Jointly written by the International Chamber of Commerce, the International Organization of Employers, the Business and Industry Advisory Committee to the OECD and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development, the paper argues, among other things, that the UN treaty process must not undermine the ongoing implementation of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, that the process must be inclusive of all stakeholders and that the treaty should address all companies, not just multinationals.

As one of the only trade associations with membership in three of the four organizations that drafted the position paper, USCIB was instrumental in working with the IOE to draft the document, and was decisive in the ICC and BIAC decisions to support the final version.

The global business community has expressed concern that the proposed UN treaty process may hinder the implementation of the UN’s Guiding Principles, which were developed over the eight year mandate of former UN Special Representative on Business and Human Rights John Ruggie, and have very quickly become the authoritative international framework on the issue. The Guiding Principles’ “protect, respect, remedy” established a framework that reaffirmed states’ obligations under international law to protect human rights, while businesses, regardless of size or ownership structure, are responsible for respecting these rights throughout their operations. The principles also establish that both states and corporations share the task of ensuring access to effective remedies for human rights victims.

“We’ve seen tremendous uptake of the UN Guiding Principles in a very short period of time, but not enough implementation, particularly on the National Action Plans that states have been tasked with creating.  The treaty process will prove most effective if it reinforces the ’protect-respect-remedy’ framework with further international legal weight, creating more pressure on states take to their duty to protect more seriously, which includes supporting and encouraging business enterprises’ efforts to respect human rights.  ,” said USCIB Vice President Ariel Meyerstein. “The treaty also provides an opportunity to strengthen the rule of law and access to remedy through national courts where harms occur. That will ultimately provide redress for more victims more efficiently than other proposed means of ensuring access to remedy, which in effect may only offer hope to victims of the most heinous violations. .”

Last year, the UN Human Rights Council voted in favor of a proposal sponsored by Ecuador and South Africa to negotiate a binding treaty on business and human rights. On July 6, the Intergovernmental Working Group (IWG) on Transnational Corporations and Human Rights, which will develop the treaty, will hold the first of several annual meetings. The position of the United States – which voted against the treaty last year – remains not to participate in the IWG. The IOE will participate in the IWG and will also host a side event to  provide business input.

Other positions by business on the UN Treaty Process include:

  • The treaty should contribute to the effective implementation of UN Guiding Principles by requiring states to draft National Action Plans.
  • The treaty’s scope of must be limited to business and human rights, not other issues such as climate change.
  • The treaty must not shift the responsibility from the entity perpetrating a human rights violation to the enterprise linked in some way to that entity, a principle well-established by both the UN Guiding Principles and OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises.
  • To strengthen national implementation, the treaty should require governments to report back to the UN supervisory machinery about measures taken.

Read the position paper: “UN Treaty Process on Business and Human Rights: Initial Observations by the International Business Community on a Way Forward.”

 

BIAC and B20 Turkey Call for Strengthening the Financing of SMEs in Global Value Chains

SMEs“For SMEs to benefit more fully from global value chains, urgent actions are needed to improve the coordination of financial regulations, strengthen access to financing and skills, and maximize the sharing of information through digital platforms,” said Bernhard Welschke, BIAC secretary general, commenting today on the release of a BIAC-B20 Turkey special publication.

Faced with the slowest post-crisis global investment recovery since the early 1970s, there is a pressing need to unlock growth, investment and jobs. However, small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) – which account for the majority of employment and over half of value-added in OECD countries – have struggled to access the financing they require to participate in and across world markets as banks have deleveraged to meet new regulatory requirements.

Conscious of the financing challenge, BIAC and B20 Turkey have released a publication halfway through the Turkish G20 Presidency entitled “Business Access to Global Value Chains and Financing SMEs.” Bringing together chapters written by prominent thinkers in government, academia, finance, and business, the publication seeks to pave the way for actions to support SMEs, in contribution to the G20 ahead of the Leaders’ Summit in November 2015.

“This BIAC-B20 Turkey publication underlines that SMEs can be best supported if all relevant actors in markets – public and private alike – undertake coordinated actions that support businesses in global value chains,” commented Rifat Hisarcıklıoğlu, B20 Turkey Chair. “Connecting the various B20 and G20 activities is central to this effort.”

Considering the outcomes from a BIAC-B20 Turkey conference held on June 4, 2015 at the OECD Headquarters in Paris, the final chapter of the publication presents three overarching recommendations to G20 Leaders:

  1. Focus on coordination, consultation and impact assessment
  2. Raise SME access to finance and skills through an integrated approach
  3. Maximize the sharing of information through digital platforms

“We encourage G20 Sherpas to use this publication as a key point of reference in preparing the G20 Leaders’ Summit Communiqué,” added Hisarcıklıoğlu.

Read the report.

USCIB Gives Feedback on OECD New Approach to Economic Challenges Project

L-R: Rick Johnston (Citi), David Mallet (Wells Fargo), Tom Molitor (Wells Fargo), Mathilde Mesnard (OECD), Peter Robinson (USCIB) and William Hynes (OECD).
L-R: Rick Johnston (Citi), David Mallet (Wells Fargo), Tom Molitor (Wells Fargo), Mathilde Mesnard (OECD), Peter Robinson (USCIB) and William Hynes (OECD).

USCIB and member representatives met with officials from the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) on January 22 at USCIB’s New York office to give feedback on the OECD’s New Approach to Economic Challenges (NAEC), aimed at updating the organization’s instruments and policy analyses.

USCIB President and CEO Peter Robinson met with the main authors of the NAEC report, Mathilde Mesnard and William Hynes, along with member representatives from Citigroup, Wells Fargo and JPMorgan Chase.

The informal meeting gave USCIB an opportunity to provide member feedback and concerns at this stage of the NAEC project.

USCIB is the American affiliate of the Business and Industry Advisory Committee to the OECD (BIAC), which acts as the voice of business in the OECD and has provided structured input to the NAEC project.

The OECD’s final synthesis report on its NAEC work will be delivered to OECD ministers in June 2015.

 

USCIB Gears Up for APEC Summit With Business Priorities

More: Boost for APEC Agenda on Marketing

The Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) is a forum comprised of 21 Pacific Rim member economies that promotes free trade and economic cooperation throughout the Asia-Pacific region. In the lead-up to APEC’s November meetings in Beijing, which will close out China’s host year, USCIB welcomes the committed partnerships that APEC sustained with the private sector to address the region’s complex economic challenges.
The Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) is a forum comprised of 21 Pacific Rim member economies that promotes free trade and economic cooperation throughout the Asia-Pacific region. In the lead-up to APEC’s November meetings in Beijing, which will close out China’s host year, USCIB welcomes the committed partnerships that APEC sustained with the private sector to address the region’s complex economic challenges.

The Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) is a forum comprised of 21 Pacific Rim member economies that promotes free trade and economic cooperation throughout the Asia-Pacific region. In the lead-up to APEC’s November meetings in Beijing, which will close out China’s host year, USCIB welcomes the committed partnerships that APEC sustained with the private sector to address the region’s complex economic challenges.

Throughout 2014, USCIB advanced a wide range of policy discussions through APEC to promote a pro-business agenda on chemicals regulation, advertising self-regulation, data privacy, customs, women in the economy and local content requirements.

USCIB engaged in several APEC working groups, including the Chemical Dialogue, Customs Business Dialogue and the Electronic Commerce Steering Group, to encourage discussions between governments and the private sector on topics of interest to business.

Next week, USCIB President and CEO Peter Robinson will attend the APEC CEO Summit in Beijing, China from November 8 to 10 as a business delegate and representative of the U.S. APEC Business Coalition along with Helen Medina, USCIB senior director of product policy and innovation, and USCIB member company CEOs and executives. Robinson and Medina will discuss USCIB’s work and members’ APEC priorities, and will join with other coalition partners to pursue common business objectives.

The APEC forum is a valuable space for business to engage with the region’s political leaders, and USCIB has assumed a leadership role in APEC on behalf of our members. At the CEO Summit this year, USCIB will organize a breakfast event on November 10 through the U.S. APEC Business Coalition to discuss the role of global value chains (GVCs) in strengthening economic integration across Pacific Rim countries. The event will feature private sector representatives and APEC government officials who will offer their perspectives on how policies and regulations impact investment decisions, supply-chain routing, cost efficiency, and key ingredients for climbing the GVC-ladder. Please find the current draft agenda here.

USCIB has also consulted with members engaged in APEC’s work to develop top-level messaging for the CEO Summit and related meetings in Beijing, as well as an APEC priorities document ahead of the 2015 APEC Summit to be hosted by the Philippines.

On October 14, the USCIB APEC Working Group met with Ed Brzytwa, Director for APEC Affairs, Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) and Bob Wang, U.S. Senior Official for APEC, U.S. Department of State, where members voiced their thoughts on priority areas including:

  • the integration of global value chains throughout the APEC region;
  • the importance of digital trade in economic development and issues regarding local content;
  • alignment to international best practices in advertising and the promotion of self-regulatory bodies (see below);
  • intellectual property rights enforcement and capacity building;
  • rule of law and ethical business practices in supply chains (child labor and human trafficking); and
  • the importance of energy security and strategic infrastructure to sustainable development.

Additionally, USCIB plans to meet with Deputy Secretary of Commerce Bruce Andrews to discuss USCIB’s APEC work and priorities.

More information on USCIB’s APEC activities will be available after the summit concludes next week.

Staff contact: Rachel Spence and Helen Medina
More on USCIB’s APEC Working Group

Boost for APEC Agenda on Marketing

Earlier this month, USCIB and the Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA) convened a well-attended roundtable in Washington, DC, on moving forward with the promotion of marketing and advertising standards work in APEC. There are strong signals that the Chinese government (this year’s APEC host) is pushing for leaders at the November APEC summit in Beijing to endorse the APEC action agenda on advertising standards, which was agreed by ministers at the August senior officials meeting.

Among other things, the action agenda calls for APEC economies to develop principles to use in constructing their ad standards regimes, as well as an advertising regulatory checklist of key elements in a regulatory (including self-regulatory) framework. USCIB and GMA members discussed with U.S. government representatives what industry would like to see next. They agreed to send a letter to U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman laying out the case for additional APEC work in this area in order to facilitate cross-border trade and investment in the APEC region.

Staff contact: Jonathan Huneke

More on USCIB’s Marketing and Advertising Committee

USCIB Issues Statement on China’s WTO Commitments

4847_image002The economic relationship between the United States and China is both vital and complex, and U.S. business holds an important stake in this relationship’s success. China’s emergence as one of the world’s largest economies means that its policies have a direct impact on its trading partners.

American engagement and exchange of best practices with the Chinese government and business community have proven to be a productive approach to addressing both countries’ common challenges and responsibilities.

Since China joined the World Trade Organization in 2001, the United States Trade Representative is required to submit a yearly report to Congress on China’s compliance and commitments to its WTO accession. USCIB submitted a statement to USTR providing member feedback, comments and recommendations on Chinese compliance with WTO commitments.

USCIB commends the U.S. and Chinese governments for positive and consistent work in ongoing bilateral dialogues, as well as the significant efforts China has made since joining the WTO to meet its obligations under the terms of its accession agreement. However, there still remain general WTO obligation compliance concerns. Broad concerns are listed below, excerpted from USCIB’s statement.

China’s Antimonopoly Law

Chinese authorities are using a variety of policy tools, which include technology standards, antitrust rules and intellectual property policies to protect and promote Chinese companies. USCIB members urge the U.S. government focus more on this issue and its effects on U.S. companies.

Intellectual Property Rights

While USCIB members acknowledge improved IPR laws and combating of IPR violations in China, there continue to be major concerns across industry sectors such as in audiovisual, software, agricultural biotechnology and chemicals. USCIB members urge the U.S. to continue to press for increased protection of IPR through better coordination and enforcement by Chinese authorities.

National Treatment

USCIB members continue to call on China to abide by their WTO commitments of national treatment and non-discrimination and ensure a competitive market that allows for foreign business participation.

Regulatory Environment

USCIB members expect Chinese authorities to fairly and transparently develop, promulgate and enforce regulations and other legal norms. However, USCIB members continue to experience business obstacles related to institutions, frameworks and regulatory enforcement. Improved coordination among regulators in China would benefit USCIB member companies by creating a more transparent and predictable framework.

State-Owned Enterprises

As they increasingly compete with Chinese SOEs, both in China, third markets and in the United States, companies believe that it is critical that the U.S. government use all available tools in dialogues with China and in other forums to press for level playing fields as they compete with these entities globally.

Staff contact: Justine Badimon

More on USCIB’s China Committee

Investment in Africa: A Positive Shift in US Policy

By Shaun Donnelly

Recent White House and Cabinet-level speeches, press releases, and fact sheets, appear to show what may be a subtle shift in the Obama Administration’s high-level rhetoric on U.S. investment abroad, at least when it comes to investing in Africa. While the administration has become a strong advocate for inward Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), seeking foreign companies to invest in the U.S. economy, it has heretofore been noticeably hesitant to say anything positive about outbound investment by U.S. companies, at times promulgating the negative effects of outbound FDI on the U.S. economy by equating it to “outsourcing” and “exporting U.S. jobs.” But last week, in the context of the impressive U.S- Africa Leaders Summit, we’ve noticed some very positive language in support of investment in Africa, coming from the very top of the administration.

Senior U.S. officials have spoken loudly, explicitly, and very positively of international investment and have also enthusiastically endorsed broader terms like “partnerships,” “doing business,” “two-way trade,” and “building long-term business relationships,” reflecting a far broader policy approach than the exports-only approach we’ve seen earlier. Words matter; and these new words are very welcome.

The following pro-investment comments are a sample extracted from high-level speeches, statements, and fact sheets surrounding the U.S. Africa Leaders Summit:

President Obama arrives on stage at the U.S. Africa Leaders Summit. Official White House Photo by Pete Souza
President Obama arrives on stage at the U.S. Africa Leaders Summit. Official White House Photo by Pete Souza

President Barack Obama:

“… I’m proud that American exports to Africa have grown to record levels, supporting jobs in Africa and the United States, including a quarter of a million good American jobs.”

  • “Today, we’re announcing $7 billion in new financing to promote American exports to Africa. Earlier today, I signed an executive order to create a new President’s advisory council of business leaders to help make sure we’re doing everything we can to help you do business in Africa.”

“…[T]he United States is making a major long-term investment in Africa’s progress. And taken together, the new commitments I’ve described today –across our government and by our many partners – total some $33 billion. And that will support development across Africa and jobs here in the United States.

“…[O]ne of the things that I hope happens with U.S. companies is that they’re constantly looking for opportunities to partner with young entrepreneurs, startups, and not just always going to the same well-established businesses.”

State Department Image
State Department Image

Secretary of State John Kerry:

“[Secretary of Commerce Pritzker] … understands that the investments in Africa are a two-way street, and when we help nations stand on their own two feet, we create opportunity elsewhere in the world, and that everybody benefits as a result of that.” Full speech here.

“ … AGOA has made it possible for Ford Motor Company to export engines duty-free from South Africa, where Ford has invested over $300 million so they can supply engines worldwide. And the efficiencies of that operation have allowed Ford to create 800 new jobs at their Kansas City plant as part of the global production line… We want and we will work hard to get more American companies to invest in Africa. We also want more African companies to invest here in the United States, and there’s no reason that they shouldn’t. The fact is, today, Africa is increasingly a destination for American investment and tourism, and African institutions are increasingly leading efforts to solve African problems. All of this underscores that dramatic transformation is possible, and it’s possible in the next few years. Prosperity can actually replace poverty, and cooperation can actually triumph over conflict.” Full remarks here.

Department Of Commerce Photo
Department Of Commerce Photo

Secretary of Commerce Penny Pritzker:

“Today, on both sides of the Atlantic, there is a clear, mutual desire to deepen our ties of trade and investment – because doing so will spur growth across the United States and the countries of Africa.”

“Investing in Africa will create jobs in Charlotte, North Carolina, and expand the power supply in Ghana – because of the $175 million deal signed by SEWW Energy to upgrade Accra’s electricity grid… will support workers in California and strengthen the health of patients in Nigeria – because of the MOU signed by the Environmental Chemical Corporation to construct a state-of-the-art cancer institute in Ibadan… [and] will spur job growth in Cincinnati through P&G’s $300 million investment in a new manufacturing plant near Lagos – because when P&G expands in Nigeria and elsewhere, it supports thousands of jobs at home.”

The bottom line is that we at USCIB have seen a lot to like in the U.S. Africa Leaders Summit, and welcome the Administration’s comments on and commitment to promoting the comprehensive U.S.- African economic relationship, including but not limited to foreign investment flows in both directions. We specifically welcome the conceptual framework reflected in administration leaders’ comments throughout the conference that FDI in Africa by U.S. companies is an important part of the answer and is good for the U.S. economy, for U.S. competitiveness, growth and jobs. We are also encouraged that U.S. business leaders, including from several leading USCIB member companies, have been included so prominently in summit events. It is our hope that this fundamental pro-FDI sentiment will be reflected across the board in U.S. policies, programs and negotiations across Africa as well as around the world.

USCIB also welcomes the following new actions and expansions of existing efforts that support the president and secretaries’ words cited above:

  • The Doing Business in Africa Campaign
    • Through the Doing Business in Africa (DBIA) Campaign, the U.S. government is strengthening its commercial relationship with the continent of Africa, a diverse region that offers substantial trade and investment opportunities across national and regional market.
    • At the U.S.-Africa Business Forum, President Obama announced $7 billion in new financing to promote U.S. exports to and investments in Africa under the DBIA Campaign.
  • An Executive Order to Create a President’s Advisory Council on Doing Business in Africa
    • The Executive Order directs the Secretary of Commerce to establish a President’s Advisory Council on Doing Business in Africa comprised of 15 members from the private sector, including small business. The Advisory Council will provide information, analysis, and recommendations to the President through the Secretary of Commerce, including on developing strategies for creating jobs in the United States and Africa through trade and investment; developing strategies by which the U.S. private sector can identify and take advantage of trade and investment opportunities in Africa; and building lasting commercial partnerships between the U.S. and African private sectors.
  • New U.S. Government Resources to Support U.S. Exports and Investment in Africa Interagency Initiatives
    • Interagency Efforts
      • The Principals of the Export-Import Bank of the United States, the Millennium Challenge Corporation, the Overseas Private Investment Corporation, the U.S. Agency for International Development, and the U.S. Trade and Development Agency will mobilize private capital for Africa’s infrastructure through a series of at least three outcome-oriented roundtables in Africa that will advance project- and sector-specific investment opportunities and needed regulatory reforms. These agencies will implement the initiative in coordination with DBIA Campaign agencies, African governments, and the U.S. and African private sectors.
      • The U.S. Department of Commerce and USTDA launched the 20×20 Initiative to support a total of 20 trade and reverse trade missions by 2020, to promote U.S. industry engagement in Africa. Working with federal, state, and local government partners, these missions will foster U.S. business partnerships with key African stakeholders.
      • The Small Business Administration (SBA) and Ex-Im Bank will collectively support 50 DBIA Campaign-themed activities and outreach sessions over the next two years to facilitate U.S. trade finance, provide counseling and training on their programs, and conduct business development to support U.S. exporters, particularly small- and medium-sized enterprises
    • Overseas Private Investment Corporation
      • OPIC will commit up to $1 billion in financing and insurance support to catalyze private sector investments in Africa. This is in addition to OPIC’s existing $1.5 billion Power Africa commitment. OPIC reaffirmed its plan to place personnel on the ground in sub-Saharan Africa to help facilitate increased U.S. trade and investment and will support an investment mission to the region, with a focus on the power sector
    • United States Agency for International Development
      • USAID will upgrade its existing African Trade Hubs into “U.S.-African Trade and Investment Hubs” that will now create new opportunities for U.S. investment in and exports to Africa. These hubs are located in Accra, Ghana, Nairobi, Kenya, and Gaborone, Botswana, and cover the West Africa, East Africa, and Southern Africa regions, respectively.

Staff contacts: Shaun Donnelly and Eva Hampl

More on USCIB’s Trade and Investment Committee

Salvaging the WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement

World Trade OrganizationBy Rob Mulligan

On July 31, India blocked the implementation of the Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA) approved by all the members of the World Trade Organization (WTO) last December, effectively preventing a deal that would have cut red tape at air- and seaports, created 21 million jobs and added $1 trillion to the global economy over the course of a decade.

USCIB advocated vigorously for the agreement’s adoption and implementation, helping to form a business coalition dedicated to moving the deal forward, and participating in a social media campaign led by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) to #savetheTFA.

Despite the global business community’s appeals, India’s action meant that WTO members failed to reach an agreement by the July 31 implementation deadline, sapping confidence in the WTO as a forum for multilateral negotiations and undermining the organization’s credibility as a monitor of international trade policies. Shortly before members missed the deadline, WTO Director General Roberto Azevedo noted “if the system fails to function properly, then the smallest nations will be the biggest losers.”

India actually stood to benefit handsomely from the TFA, with research suggesting that the agreement’s implementation would have added $21 billion to India’s economy by 2020. New Delhi blocked the deal and held it hostage because it sought to renegotiate multilateral rules that would exempt Indian food security subsidies from WTO review. But by delaying the TFA’s implementation, it will now be more difficult to address broader multilateral trade negotiations, including food security subsidies.

All is not lost, however, and it is worth noting that there are options to get countries back to the negotiating table. For example, the Peterson Institute’s Jeffrey F. Schott and Gary Clyde Hufbauer have published an article in which they put forward a number of ideas to salvage the TFA. Schott and Hufbauer are the authors of an earlier study that estimated the payoff from the TFA would amount to $1 trillion to global GDP over time. They argue that if obstructionist countries do not relent, the next best alternative would be a plurilateral TFA, binding only those member countries who sign on to the deal.

There is a window of opportunity to salvage the TFA and the WTO multilateral system when trade ambassadors return to Geneva in September. In the lead-up to these negotiations, USCIB will be reviewing the Peterson study and other analyses, and working with the United States government, ICC and other members of our global network to get the TFA talks back on track as soon as possible. USCIB is also organizing a forum for discussing the TFA and other trade issues at our October 30 conference: Exploring New Approaches to Trade, Investment and Jobs.

Rob Mulligan is senior vice president of policy and government affairs at the United States Council for International Business.

Staff contact: Rob Mulligan

More on USCIB’s Trade and Investment Committee

Global Trade Set to Benefit From ICC Trade Register Report

4762_image002It has long been anecdotally known that trade finance is a low risk for lenders. That claim now has a wealth of data to back it up. Today the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) released its 2014 Trade Register Report, providing overwhelming evidence that trade and export finance – in all its forms – is a low risk bank financing technique.

The report supports ICC’s and USCIB’s advocacy of trade finance as a strong contribution to economic recovery and growth. Its findings hold the potential to alter attitudes towards trade finance, and therefore contribute to the growth of both global trade and the global economy.

The Trade Register also highlights a concern about the effect overly-stringent money laundering regulations have on trade finance flows. Strict regulations have damaged access of some firms to trade and export finance services.

“The intention of the Register was to progress the understanding of trade finance, its importance to global trade and its highly-effective risk mitigation capabilities,” explained Kah Chye Tan, Chair of ICC Banking Commission. “The impact of the Register, however, is much greater. As the latest results show, the Register provides concrete fact-based evidence that trade finance is low risk which, if fully reflected in capital requirements, would help banks to give companies the financing support they need for their exports, and to contribute even further to the global economy as it recovers from the global financial crisis.”

The report’s findings may help policymakers understand the negative consequences such laws have on export finance, which is crucial for economic growth in the developing world.

First launched in 2009 by ICC’s Banking Commission, the report is widely recognized as one of the world’s leading analytical reports on global risks for the trade finance industry—identifying risks across a range of trade finance products and markets.

Read more on the ICC website.

ICC Flags up Concerns Over Effect of Money-Laundering Laws (Financial Times)

Staff contact: Eva Hampl

More on USCIB’s Banking Committee

 

USCIB Paper on Chinas WTO Compliance

USCIB worked with members to submit a statement last month on China’s compliance with its WTO commitments, in response to a federal register notice from the office of the U.S. Trade Representative.

The statement discusses the following cross-sectoral and sectoral issues:

Cross-sectoral: Certification, Licensing and Testing Barriers, Government Procurement, Intellectual Property Rights, Market Access, National Treatment and Non-Discrimination, Regulatory Environment, Standards, State-Owned Enterprises, Taxation

Sectoral: Agricultural Biotechnology, Audiovisual, Chemicals, Customs, Express Delivery Services (EDS), Software and Telecommunications (Services and Equipment).

USCIB’s China Committee will continue working on a more detailed response to USTR’s request and will be in contact with members to develop further sections, including an Annex which will address China transparency and regulatory notice and comment issues, as well as sections on chemicals, electronic payments and pharmaceuticals.

Staff contact: Justine Badimon

More on USCIB’s China Committee

Business Pushes for Trade Promotion Authority

4597_image001The business community is urging Congress to act swiftly to pass legislation giving the president fast-track ability to negotiate free trade agreements. Such legislation would require Congress to make up-or-down votes on ratification of trade pacts without amendment.

In a letter to the leadership of the Senate Finance and House Ways and Means committees seeking passage of Trade Promotion Authority, USCIB and the other members of the Trade Benefits America coalition urged passage of legislation before the end of the year, saying that, without action, high-level trade talks would be jeopardized.

“Currently, the United States is pursuing an exceptionally ambitious and diverse range of trade negotiations, including the Trans-Pacific Partnership, the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership, and the Trade in Services Agreement,” coalition members wrote. “These negotiations involve important 21st century trade issues – such as foreign restrictions on cross-border data flows, unfair competition from state-owned enterprises, intellectual property rights, forced localization barriers to trade and investment, and international regulatory cooperation – that have evolved or emerged since 2002. By updating and passing TPA, Congress can help shape the negotiating goals pursued by U.S. negotiators while also strengthening the hand of those negotiators in achieving solid outcomes favorable to the United States.”

The letter said passage of TPA would strengthen the partnership between Congress and the executive branch – which the coalition said “has long proven critical to negotiating U.S. trade agreements and getting them implemented by Congress” – thereby helping to ensure a meaningful role for legislators at all stages of trade negotiations.

Staff contact: Rob Mulligan

More on USCIB’s Trade and Investment Committee