Supreme Court Sides With Arbitrators in Investment Treaty Ruling

4687_image001In a ruling with important ramifications for global investment, the U.S. Supreme Court on March 5 ruled that arbitrators, as opposed to local courts, have authority to resolve jurisdictional disputes under bilateral investment treaties (BITs). USCIB had submitted a friend-of-the-court brief urging the court to rule in favor of arbitrator authority in such matters.

In a 7-2 decision, the justices upheld a $185 million award of an UNCITRAL (UN Commission on International Trade Law) tribunal in a dispute brought by BG Group of the UK under the UK-Argentina BIT, reversing an earlier circuit court ruling. Although the dispute was between British and Argentine parties, the appeal was filed in U.S. courts since the arbitration was conducted in Washington.

The outcome was in line with earlier Supreme Court rulings in commercial arbitration cases, under which arbitral tribunals have enjoyed broad discretion to determine whether contractual preconditions to arbitration have been satisfied.

Specifically, the Court noted that a treaty is a contract “between nations” and that, as a result, arbitral tribunals interpreting procedural provisions in treaties should be afforded the same level of deference as arbitral tribunals interpreting procedural provisions in contracts.

In its brief, USCIB argued: “This Court has consistently emphasized the central importance of protecting the decision of parties to a contract to resolve their disputes through arbitration. Applying that basic principle, federal courts have repeatedly held that where parties agree that a dispute should be submitted to arbitration pursuant to one of certain sets of arbitral rules – rules that include provisions delegating to the arbitral tribunal the authority to determine questions as to its own jurisdiction over the dispute – then the parties have agreed that the arbitral tribunal has the authority to resolve disputes as to arbitrability.”

By virtue of our affiliation with the International Chamber of Commerce, USCIB works closely with the ICC International Court of Arbitration®, the world’s leading forum for the settlement of cross-border commercial disputes. To learn more about ICC arbitration and ADR services on ICC’s website, please click here.

 

Staff contacts: Josefa Sicard-Mirabal

ICC Mediation Competition Attracts Teams From Around the World

Laura Wolfe (left) and Mary Grace White of the New York University School of Law teamed up to win a place in the quartersfinals of the annual ICC mediation competition.
Laura Wolfe (left) and Mary Grace White of the New York University School of Law teamed up to win a place in the quartersfinals of the annual ICC mediation competition.

The biggest-ever ICC Mediation Competition, which took place over six days in Paris earlier this month, brought together 66 university teams and 120 professional mediators from around the world.

In a final closely observed by some 350 spectators, law students demonstrated their mediation advocacy skills in solving a hypothetical but lifelike dispute over the patenting of a newly invented pharmaceutical drug.

Applying ICC’s new Mediation Rules, a team from Monash University in Australia played the part of the requesting party, and a team from Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität in Munich the respondent, with team members acting as either counsel or client.

The team from Munich emerged victorious, earning internships with the ICC International Centre for ADR and the litigation and arbitration department of the law firm Linklaters.

“The competition is a great opportunity to see how students from other countries and jurisdictions address commercial disputes that businesses face,” said Conor McLaughlin, a member of the winning team along with Harley Steward and Martina Rehman. “Mediation is probably new to a lot of law students. Most focus primarily on litigation. So this competition gives us an opportunity to explore other ways of resolving disputes, and try and find solutions that don’t involve the lengthy, costly, and sometimes destructive, route to litigation.”

Munich was coached by Raffael Probst, of the Munich Center for Dispute Resolution, with help from doctoral candidate David Kaufmann. “My research is mainly on psychology and neuroscience of moral judgment and cooperative behavior, which kind of helps when it comes to understanding how you get the other side to stay at the table and join you in exploring joint interests and options,” said Kaufmann. “It was very interesting to see, for the first time, how things I know in theory actually translate to the practice of mediation and negotiation.”

“Through our annual Mediation Competition, ICC aims to raise awareness of mediation which provides businesses with a procedural framework to settle matters cordially, rapidly and cost-effectively,” said ICC Secretary General Jean-Guy Carrier. “ICC is proud to contribute to the education of the next generation of dispute resolution specialists and to provide a platform for mediators from all around the world. We hope all participants return home with increased knowledge and skills, helping promote high mediation standards around the world.”

“Elated” was how Mary Grace White, one of two students representing New York University School of Law, described herself upon earning a spot in the quarterfinals: “We worked hard on this, and we’re very, very happy to be here. I hope it’s going to create new interest in mediation back home, especially with New York University’s focus on international law.”

Teammate Laura Wolfe added: “All the teams we pled against were amazing: we learned so much from them, and from the judges’ feedback. Everyone has been willing to answer questions and give us constructive tips, and that’s something in our experience that’s unique to this competition. It’s useful, in all facets of law, to learn the mediation skills set, the ability to actively listen to someone and try to see where they’re coming from. It’s whetted our appetite for exploring other mediation opportunities.”

Many universities competing in the ICC Mediation Competition for the first time got through to this year’s final rounds, including teams from Aarhus, Maastricht, and Trinidad and Tobago. With 66 teams competing from universities in 32 countries, helped by 120 professionals volunteering as mediators and judges, this year’s event has attracted more than 500 participants.

Read more on ICC’s website.

Staff contact: Josefa Sicard-Mirabal

As New York Facility Begins Administering Cases, ICC Arbitration Passes Milestone

SICANA team members in New York (L-R): Sherlin Tung, Suzanne Ulicny, Rachel Clarke, Rocio Digon, Steven Holder, Josefa Sicard-Mirabal.
SICANA team members in New York (L-R): Sherlin Tung, Suzanne Ulicny, Rachel Clarke, Rocio Digon, Steven Holder, Josefa Sicard-Mirabal.

The International Court of Arbitration® of the International Chamber of Commerce registered its 20,000th case, just as the Court’s new facility to administer ICC arbitrations in North America formally opened its doors in New York City.

On January 27, SICANA, the U.S. corporate entity responsible for the administration of cases under ICC dispute resolution rules, and for the promotion of ICC dispute resolution services in North America, started administering existing cases and registering new requests for arbitration.

That evening, a welcoming reception to celebrate the opening of SICANA – housed at the same Midtown Manhattan address as USCIB’s headquarters – was presided over by ICC Chairman Terry McGraw, chairman of McGraw Hill Financial [now S&P Global].

“ICC has been firmly committed to establishing a presence in one of the Court’s most important markets for some time,” said Court President John Beechey. “I am delighted that that ambition has now been realized with the start of the Court’s operations in New York, where cases are now being administered and may be registered. This is a very important development for the Court’s business worldwide.”

The New York office, led by SICANA Executive Director Josefa Sicard-Mirabal, encompasses an educational and training team, including deputy directors Rachel Clarke and Suzanne Ulicny, and a case management team which includes:  Rocio Digon, counsel; Steven Holder, deputy counsel; and Sherlin Tung, deputy counsel.

SICANA Executive Director Josefa Sicard-Mirabal with ICC Chairman Terry McGraw (center) and USCIB President and CEO Peter Robinson.
SICANA Executive Director Josefa Sicard-Mirabal with ICC Chairman Terry McGraw (center) and USCIB President and CEO Peter Robinson.

Case No. 20,000 came in the form of a transport sector dispute, initiated by a U.S. claimant against a Canadian respondent. The arbitration is seated in Chicago and applies the laws of the State of New York.

“We are delighted to be part of ICC’s 20,000th milestone case and look forward to upholding the principles of dispute resolution rules and promoting ICC dispute resolution services in this region,” Digon.

“In conjunction with ICC Secretariat case management teams in Paris and Hong Kong, the Manhattan-based team will significantly increase the appeal of our arbitration services to parties, counsel and arbitrators in North America,” according to Andrea Carlevaris, the ICC Court’s secretary general.

North American parties made up nearly 10 percent of the 767 cases filed with the Court in 2013. Case number 20,000 brings the number of cases arbitrated under the 2012 ICC Rules of Arbitration to 1,485. The ICC International Court of Arbitration® was established in 1923, soon after the world business organization’s founding.

ICC’s current Rules of Arbitration have been in force since the beginning of 2012 and are used worldwide to resolve disputes through arbitration – governing the conduct of ICC Arbitration proceedings from start to finish.

To learn more about ICC arbitration and ADR services on ICC’s website, please click here.

Staff contacts: Josefa Sicard-Mirabal

In Davos ICC Addresses Global Challenges

L-R: ICC Chairman Terry McGraw, WTO Director General Roberto Azevedo and ICC Vice Chair Sunil Mittal
L-R: ICC Chairman Terry McGraw, WTO Director General Roberto Azevedo and ICC Vice Chair Sunil Mittal

A contingent of business leaders under the banner of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) participated in the annual World Economic Forum in Davos this week to press for continued progress on trade, investment and business priorities for the G20.

Led by ICC Chairman Terry McGraw (who also serves as chairman of USCIB), Vice Chairman Sunil Mittal and Secretary General Jean-Guy Carrier, the group included several CEO members of the ICC G20 Advisory Group as well as members of ICC commissions, the ICC working bodies that develop ICC policy positions and voluntary rules on major issues for international business.

Davos highlights include Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott‘s keynote address outlining Australia’s G20 priorities to boost global trade, strengthen tax regimes and coordination, address infrastructure investment bottlenecks and further improve financial regulation. Abbott announced hopes that G20 leaders could make a practical difference towards building a stronger and more prosperous global economy in 2014.

Read more on ICC’s website.

Staff contact: Rob Mulligan

ICC Dispute Resolution Services

The International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) has long been the world’s preeminent organization in the field of international commercial dispute resolution. ICC established its International Court of Arbitration® in 1923, only four years after the world business organization itself was created, and took the lead in securing the worldwide acceptance of arbitration as the most effective way of resolving international commercial disputes.

ICC has developed a wide range of dispute resolution services to provide international business with alternatives to court litigation, including:

 

3262_image001ICC Arbitration
The world’s most trusted arbitration system

Arbitration is the most commonly used ICC dispute resolution service.  Arbitration offers a binding dispute resolution procedure, with flexibility in language, location and applicable law.  Parties agree upon the specific procedures for the arbitration tribunal, and can either select arbitrators or have ICC appoint experienced and independent arbitrators from around the world.  Arbitration offers final, binding decisions in less time and with less expense than ordinary judicial proceedings.  Over 130 countries have signed and ratified the United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, thereby agreeing to recognize and enforce foreign arbitral awards.

 

3262_image004Pre-arbitral Referee
Ordering urgent provisional measures

During the course of many contracts, especially those made for long-term transactions, problems can arise which require an urgent response. It is frequently not possible to obtain in the time required a final decision from an arbitral tribunal or from a court. If parties have agreed in writing, they can apply to a pre-arbitral referee for urgent provisional measures relating to a dispute.

ICC’s Rules for a Pre-Arbitral Referee Procedure provide for rapid recourse to a referee, who is empowered to order measures such as the preservation or recording of evidence. The order provides a temporary resolution of the dispute and may lay the foundations for its final settlement either by agreement or otherwise. The referee can either be agreed upon by the parties or appointed by the Chairman of the International Court of Arbitration®.  The measures ordered by the referee are binding until decided otherwise by a court or Arbitral Tribunal.

 

3262_image006Appointing Authority
Appointing independent, competent arbitrators for ad hoc proceedings

Throughout more than eighty years of administering international arbitrations, ICC has acquired exceptional experience in appointing arbitrators. In addition, ICC is supported by a worldwide network of national committees able to identify arbitrators with appropriate qualifications of many different nationalities and from various spheres of activity.

Parties in UNCITRAL or other ad hoc proceedings can authorize ICC to appoint an independent arbitrator. They can also give the International Court of Arbitration® other powers, including the power to decide upon challenges of arbitrators, whether or not appointed by ICC.

 

3262_image007ICC ADR
Resolving disputes amicably

ICC has developed an array of non-binding amicable dispute resolution techniques under the heading ICC ADR. Requiring the mutual goodwill and consent of the parties, these techniques provide a flexible, rapid and relatively inexpensive way to settle business disputes.

The final decision reached by these techniques is not binding on parties unless otherwise agreed.  The neutral can be agreed upon by the parties or appointed by ICC according to specific requirements or qualifications specified by the parties.

 

3262_image009ICC Dispute Board Rules
Resolving contractual disputes for mid- or long-term projects

Over the past several decades, dispute boards (DBs) have become a standard method of dispute resolution for contractual disputes concerning mid- to long-term projects, such as construction projects. Determinations made by DBs are not enforceable at law as such, although they may become contractually binding on the parties.

ICC offers the international business community a set of documents providing a comprehensive and flexible framework for establishing and operating DBs in a wide range of contracts in different industries. These documents comprise the ICC Dispute Board Rules, the Model Dispute Board Member Agreement and the Standard ICC Dispute Board Clauses.

 

3262_image010ICC International Centre for Expertise
A technical resource for dispute resolution

Created in 1976, the ICC International Centre for Expertise has built up unique access to experts in every conceivable subject relevant to business operations.  Parties can request that the Centre propose an expert, appoint an expert or administer the expertise proceedings. Expertise provided can be used to settle disputes, resolve differences of opinion or clarify facts.  If agreed upon by the parties, the findings can be binding.  ICC expertise can also be used as part of litigation or arbitration proceedings.

ICC’s Rules for Expertise, to which parties may refer in their contracts or at a later stage in their relationship, were updated in 2003 to meet evolving business needs and expertise.

 

3262_image011ICC DOCDEX
Resolving letter of credit disputes

First approved in October 1997, ICC’s DOCDEX rules were a response to a call from the international banking community for a rapid, cost-effective means of resolving disputes that arise under letters of credit.

DOCDEX provides dispute settlement through document-based expert decisions made by three experts, verified by the technical advisor of the ICC Banking Commission and issued by the International Centre for Expertise.  The process normally takes 30-60 days, rather than the years that can be involved in court proceedings. DOCDEX decisions are not binding unless the parties have agreed otherwise.

News Brief New ICC Mediation Rules Launched

The International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) unveiled new ICC Rules of Mediation earlier this month at a global launch conference attended by some of the company representatives set to benefit from the new Rules, together with leading experts in mediation and dispute resolution.

Coming into force on January 1, 2014, the new ICC Rules replace the ICC ADR Rules that have been used for amicable dispute resolution worldwide since 2001. The new Rules have been adapted to help parties resolve even the most complex cross-border disputes quickly and reliably. Changes include the setting of mediation as the default technique, as well as increased support from the ICC International Centre for ADR, the body administering the new Rules.

Andrea Carlevaris, director of ICC Dispute Resolution Services and secretary general of the ICC International Court of Arbitration,® who gave a welcome address at the launch event, said: “The new ICC Mediation Rules strike a good balance between two essential elements of a modern and efficient dispute resolution tool: clarity of the procedural framework and flexibility. In-house counsel and other representatives of businesses played an important role in the drafting process and made sure that the result responds to the needs of users.”

Available in eight languages, with further languages ready soon, the Rules are accompanied by a new publication for users, the ICC Mediation Guidance Note. They were revised by a taskforce of 90 specialists from 29 countries – made up of mediation users, mediators, counsel and other dispute resolution experts – and validated by ICC’s Commission on Arbitration and ADR, whose members represent some 100 countries.

Read more on the ICC website.

Staff contact: Josefa Sicard-Mirabal

USCIB Hails Breakthrough Adoption of WTO Bali Package

USCIB Chairman Terry McGraw, who also chairs the International Chamber of Commerce, congratulated governments on adoption of a new package of trade liberalization measures
USCIB Chairman Terry McGraw, who also chairs the International Chamber of Commerce, congratulated governments on adoption of a new package of trade liberalization measures

New York, N.Y., December 7, 2013 – The United States Council for International Business (USCIB) applauded the adoption of an ambitious package of trade liberalization measures by World Trade Organization members at the WTO ministerial in Bali, Indonesia today.

”WTO members have delivered a dose of holiday cheer to a struggling global economy,” said USCIB President and CEOPeter Robinson. “We congratulate ministers on making the tough choices necessary to push this package of agreements past the finish line. They have demonstrated once again the critical importance of multilateral trade liberalization.”

Expectations ahead of the Bali meeting were low, said Robinson, in light of the inability of WTO members to agree to a package in preliminary meetings in Geneva last month, leaving the tough decisions for trade ministers. But he said the business community did not give up hope, and indeed redoubled its efforts to push governments toward an agreement. Robinson said the result – a set of agreements to, among other things, facilitate global trade through modernization of  customs and other administrative practices – “will add billions of dollars to global GDP and create millions of jobs.”

A major business push came from the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), which earlier this year estimated that a trade facilitation agreement alone would deliver global job gains of 21 million, with developing countries gaining more than 18 million jobs and developed countries increasing their workforce by three million.

“With our help, 159 countries came together to reach a trade facilitation agreement that will boost the world’s economy by almost one trillion U.S. dollars,” said ICC Chairman Terry McGraw, who also serves as USCIB’s chairman, in a video message to governments and ICC members worldwide. “What an accomplishment! And the good news is everyone participated.”

McGraw said the agreement “breaks through the logjam that has bottled up trade agreements for the last decade, and paves the way for future agreements that will further increase global growth and job creation.”

The business community, already rallying in support of renewed Trade Promotion Authority as well as prospective U.S. trade pacts with 12 Asia-Pacific nations and the European Union, will push hard for adoption of the Bali package by Congress, according to USCIB Senior Vice President Rob Mulligan, who attended the Bali ministerial and who spearheads USCIB’s Washington-based activities. “We in the private sector are united in our support for this agreement, and for additional action to spur jobs and growth through international trade,” he said.

About USCIB:

USCIB promotes open markets, competitiveness and innovation, sustainable development and corporate responsibility, supported by international engagement and regulatory coherence. Its members include U.S.-based global companies and professional services firms from every sector of our economy, with operations in every region of the world. With a unique global network encompassing leading international business organizations, including ICC, USCIB provides business views to policy makers and regulatory authorities worldwide, and works to facilitate international trade and investment. More at www.uscib.org.

 

Contact:
Jonathan Huneke, USCIB
+1 212.703.5043 (office), +1 917.420.0039 (mobile), jhuneke@uscib.org

More on USCIB’s Trade and Investment Committee

Business and Human Rights Forum a Step Backward

USCIB and two of the global business groups with which we are affiliated – the International Organization of Employers(IOE) and the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) – represented business at the second annual United Nations Forum on Business and Human Rights, December 2-4 in Geneva. A number of USCIB member companies also attended, including BP, Chevron, GE, Google, Hess, Microsoft, Nestlé and Procter & Gamble.

The annual UN forum is designed to bring business, government, civil society and other stakeholders together to discuss the status, opportunities and challenges of implementing the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.

According to Adam Greene, USCIB’s vice president for labor affairs and corporate responsibility, this year’s discussion was much more negative and critical towards business. The consensus developed by John Ruggie, the former UN special representative for business and human rights, during his mandate is fraying and may collapse if left unaddressed.

In addition, the obligation of governments, under the UN Guiding Principles, to protect human rights continues to be minimized, with nearly all of the attention focused on companies’ concomitant responsibility to respect human rights.

The forum concluded with a number of statements that the UN Guiding Principles have not worked and that the UN should develop a legally binding treaty on multinational enterprises. The government of Ecuador plans to organize a meeting to push this proposal forward at the next meeting of the UN Human Rights Council.

Read more in the IOE news release on the forum.

Staff contact: Adam Greene

More on USCIB’s Corporate Responsibility Committee

Historic Opening of New Israel Palestine Center to Mediate Commercial Disputes

4637_image001Israeli and Palestinian business leaders joined the leadership of the International Chamber of Commerce in Jerusalem today to inaugurate the first dedicated Israeli-Palestinian center for the resolution of commercial disputes between businesses in the Palestinian territories and Israel.

John Beechey, president of the ICC International Court of Arbitration®, joined Andrea Carlevaris, the Court’s secretary general and ICC Secretary General Jean-Guy Carrier in Jerusalem to witness the historic launch of the Jerusalem Arbitration Center (JAC) and the signing of a memorandum of engagement.

“We are hopeful the $4 billion in annual trade between Palestinians and Israelis will expand significantly now that there is a mechanism in place to bring swift and fair resolution to commercial disputes and create greater certainty for the business community,” said Terry McGraw, chairman of McGraw Hill Financial [now S&P Global] and chairman of both ICC and USCIB. “By strengthening commercial relations and improving economic cooperation between the Palestinian and Israeli people there are new opportunities to attract investments and enhance long-term economic growth in the region.”

The opening of the center is the first measure taken since the 1993 Oslo Accords to establish an internationally accepted arbitration mechanism to resolve commercial disputes between Israel and the Palestinian territories. ICC has been instrumental in establishing the JAC, a joint venture agreement between ICC Palestine, which is based in the West Bank, and ICC Israel. The center will serve as a wholly independent provider of dispute resolution services for the settlement of commercial disputes between Palestinian and Israeli businesses using specific rules drafted for the JAC based on the ICC Rules of Arbitration.

“The Jerusalem Arbitration Center is a truly neutral and independent forum, the purpose of which is to provide dispute resolution services in which parties from Israel and Palestine can have real confidence,” stated Beechey.The International Court of Arbitration® will continue to offer active support to the center, notably in the form of on-going training and guidance on issues such as the criteria for selecting arbitrators and establishing jurisdiction.”

Read more on ICC’s website.

Staff contacts: Josefa Sicard-Mirabal

ICC Launches Research Papers on Innovation and Intellectual Property

The International Chamber of Commerce unveiled the first in a series of research papers on the interface between innovation and intellectual property (IP) today at a conference in Brazil co-organized by ICC and the Brazilian National Confederation of Industry (CNI).

The series of five research papers will provide insights on how IP interacts with decisions, transactions and processes related to technology development and dissemination.

Daphne Yong-d’Herve, chief intellectual property officer at ICC, said the research project aims to contribute to a better and more concrete understanding of the innovation-IP interface. “An improved understanding of how IP is actually used in innovative processes will help inform discussions taking place today among governments, businesses and other stakeholders on how to design frameworks and measures that will help stimulate innovation and growth,” she said.

The first paper, “Enhancing IP Management and Appropriation by Innovative SMEs,” addresses how innovative small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) can improve their performance through better management of their intellectual assets.

Further papers will explore issues relating to: innovation and knowledge exchange through global networks and partnerships, the evolving geography of innovation, IP in innovation for non-commercial purposes, and diffusion channels for technology and know-how.

Read more on ICC’s website.

More on USCIB’s Intellectual Property Committee