Taking Stock of Business Conduct

The OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises are the most comprehensive international instrument for responsible business conduct and are supported by a unique implementation mechanism of National Contact Points (NCPs) established by adhering governments.

NCPs have been part of the MNE Guidelines since 1984. However it was the 2000 review that gave them a stronger role to deal with all matters relating to the Guidelines, including resolving issues related to non-observance. Since then, the number of complaints against companies has been on the rise.

To take stock of the experience over the last 15 years, the OECD has conducted an analysis of the functioning and performance of the NCP mechanism. The full report was published at the end of June on the occasion of the 40th anniversary of the MNE Guidelines.

The Business of Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals

Business for 2030 logo

The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) bring the global community together in a bid to end poverty and hunger, fight climate change, and achieve sustainable economic growth. How can businesses play their part in this universal effort, and what’s in it for them?

USCIB Vice President for Labor Affairs, Corporate Responsibility and Governance Ariel Meyerstein was quoted in an article by Eco-Business about how the private sector is participating in the global development agenda.

One major initiative is Business for 2030, launched last September by the New York-based United States Council for International Business (USCIB). The programme showcases efforts by companies worldwide to contribute to the SDGs, and aims to foster partnerships between the public and private sectors to meet the goals.

Ariel Meyerstein, USCIB’s vice-president of labour affairs, corporate responsibility and governance, recalls that in 2014, the organisation recognised that the SDGs offered an unprecedented space for the private sector to participate in the global development agenda.

“This meant that businesses needed to quickly get up to speed on this vast, ambitious, and dizzying new framework,” he says. “Business for 2030 provides a public resource that helps translate existing and ongoing corporate activities into the new SDG language.”

This collection of concrete examples not only offers other businesses case studies on how to get involved, but also allows governments to identify good corporate initiatives in their own countries, which they can then collaborate with, explains Meyerstein.

The site today hosts more than 140 initiatives from 35 firms which are implemented across 150 countries.

Read the full article at Eco-Business

The Sustainable Development Goals as Business Opportunities

SustainabilityThe scale and ambition of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) create a tremendous opportunity for the private sector to demonstrate the central role it plays in human prosperity. Business will serve as an essential partner to meet the challenge of achieving the SDGs.

The recently unveiled OECD Development Co-operation Report 2016: The Sustainable Development Goals as Business Opportunities, acknowledges the private sector’s role as a “powerful promoter of sustainable development”. It also highlights the opportunity for the governments to leverage private sector contribution, helping to manage risk and providing insights into effective policy and practice. The publication lists the enabling factors, as well as the constraints, for businesses and investors interested in addressing sustainable development challenges.

The report also provides guidance on responsible business conduct and outlines the challenges in mobilizing and measuring private finance to achieve the SDGs. Throughout the report, practical examples illustrate how business is already promoting sustainable development and inclusive growth in developing countries. USCIB and its global network contributed to the report:

  • Shaun Donnelly, USCIB’s vice president for investment and financial services, contributed an article titled “Pro-Investment policies really matter!” about the link between good investment policies and development (p. 61 in the report).
  • Louise Kantrow, the International Chamber of Commerce’s permanent representative to the United Nations, highlighted the shared interests between the business community and the development community in her piece, “Sustainable development challenges are business challenges.” (p. 28 in the report)
  • And during the report’s launch event, USCIB Vice President for Labor Affairs, Corporate Responsibility and Governance Ariel Meyerstein showcased the influential Business for 2030 website, an initiative by USCIB highlighting the contributions from the private sector in helping to achieve the SDGs.

More details, including ways to access the report can be found on the OECD Website.

IOE at Labor Ministerial: Implement G20 Commitments

L-R: U.S. Labor Secretary Thomas Perez and Ronnie Goldberg (USCIB) in Beijing
L-R: U.S. Labor Secretary Thomas Perez and Ronnie Goldberg (USCIB) in Beijing

IOE Vice President Mthunzi Mdwaba stressed the need for programs and reforms to encourage entrepreneurship and innovation at the G20 Labor Ministerial in Beijing. In He made several statements in support of implementation of G20 commitments.

“Promoting and enabling entrepreneurship and innovation will contribute to more dynamic labor markets, which concomitantly will lead to the generation of more jobs and which will of course enable people to reach their full potential by opening their own businesses, instead of just being employed,” he said. “We would like to urge for a special focus to be given to youth entrepreneurship. Young entrepreneurs not only bring vibrancy and innovation to world economies, they also typically hire other youth. This is particularly important in view of the youth unemployment challenge we all want to tackle.”

Ronnie Goldberg, USCIB senior counsel, attended the ministerial in her capacity as chair of the Business and Industry Advisory Committee (BIAC) to the OECD Employment Labor and Social Affairs Committee. At the ministerial Goldberg pressed for continued joint leadership by BIAC and the International Organization of Employers (IOE) in ongoing negotiations with the Labor-20.

Mdwaba applauded the G20 entrepreneurship initiative that has been adopted and emphasized the need for an enabling environment for business, to raise the status of apprenticeships and to reduce in non-wage labor costs as measures to ensure the G20 employment process is a success.

IOE Meets with G20 Labor Ministers

The International Organization of Employers (IOE) jointly with the Business and Industry Advisory Committee (BIAC) to the OECD, Deloitte, the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC) and the Trade Union Advisory Committee (TUAC) to the OECD hosted an informal gathering with G20 governments, employers and trade unions in Beijing as part of the G20 process.

IOE-BIAC survey to monitor implementation of G20 commitments

The event provided the opportunity to highlight the outcomes of the IOE-BIAC’s efforts to monitor implementation of G20 commitments. The results are mixed, showing that on one hand most governments followed up on the Melbourne and Ankara G20 Labor Ministers’ Declarations and have developed initiatives to implement the commitments, but on the other hand, in areas such as reduction of non-wage labor costs, the situation has worsened in a number of countries.

The level of ownership of the national employment plans among employers’ organisations was also put into question. The majority of employers’ federations in G20 countries show little confidence in the impact of the G20 process on producing major policy changes at the national level. All in all, while follow-up at the national level to G20 commitments is seen to be taking place, it is perceived as being insufficient in addressing the main employment challenges at hand.

Joint IOE-BIAC/ITUC-TUAC statement on “innovation, growth, jobs and decent work”

The informal gathering also served as a platform to launch the IOE-BIAC/ITUC-TUAC joint statement to the G20 Labor Ministerial. The statement refers to the joint B20-L20 messages of 2015 because of the “failure of many G20 economies to recover from recession and the elusive nature of global growth”.

The joint statement provides recommendations in six main areas:

  1. develop a policy framework for better technology diffusion
  2. determinedly tackle youth unemployment
  3. pursue macro-economic policies that promote employment
  4. make a reality of the 2014 Brisbane target of reducing by 25 percent the gender gap in employment by 2025
  5. promote formality and implement the recommendation on informality adopted by the 2015 International Labor Conference
  6. business and labor play a key role in the shaping of economic and social policy

Successful Policies to Fight Obesity

Healthy food in heart and cholesterol diet conceptAre there any successful policies and programs to fight overweight and obesity? USCIB responded to the UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Global Forum request for answers to this important question.

“All facets of society, including the private sector, have an important role to play in helping to reduce the incidence and burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs),” USCIB said in comments submitted to the FAO on June 30. “This view is supported by World Health Organization (WHO) and OECD strategies recognizing that NCD solutions require a whole-of-society approach, multi-sectoral actions, and collaboration among governments, civil society and the private sector. Given the complex and multi-factorial nature of NCDs, it is essential that all stakeholders work together to develop holistic, sustainable solutions.”

The comments note that the food and beverage industry’s efforts to prevent NCDs are guided by sound, science-based polices that include:

  • Providing a range of nutritious product choices and marketing them in ways that promote healthy lifestyles
  • Improving awareness and understanding of nutrition and energy balance
  • Communicating clearly through labeling, packaging, websites, brochures, and in-store communications to enable consumers to make informed choices
  • Undertaking responsible advertising practices, taking into account the special needs of children
  • Emphasizing the importance of achieving a balance throughout life of physical activity and nutrition
  • Partnering with other stakeholders in these endeavors.

The comments also list several examples of voluntary industry efforts that have contributed to the fight against obesity and other NCDs.

Read USCIB’s comments.

Roundtable on Business Engagement in the Paris Climate Agreement and INDCs

forest_greenThe Business and Industry Advisory Committee (BIAC) to the OECD welcomed the successful conclusion of COP 21 in Paris last December and underlined the importance of active business involvement in the implementation of the agreement. On September 12, the Major Economies Business Forum (BizMEF) in cooperation with BIAC will organize a roundtable on Business Engagement in Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs), or country pledges, and the Paris Agreement, back-to-back with the bi-annual OECD/IEA Climate Change Expert Group Meeting in Paris.

Over the past year, major business organizations have shared their experiences consulting with national governments in the preparation of initial INDCs and contributed to a survey prepared by USCIB. Participants from business, governments, academia and international institutions will discuss results and lessons learned as well as ways that business can contribute to the new five-year cycles of domestic and international processes to take stock of global implications and to renew and review INDCs. Discussions will benefit from the unique insights business has into the implications of the portfolio of INDCs for their operations, and investments, and for supply and value chains in the globalized economy.

USCIB Reflections on the New World of Work

Ronnie speaking IMG_0183
Ronnie Goldberg (center).

The following remarks were delivered by Ronnie Goldberg, USCIB senior counsel, at the first meeting of the working groups of the XIX Inter-American Conference of Ministers of Labor (IACML) in Washington, D.C. on June 28. 

First Meeting of the XIX IACML Working Groups

June 28, 2016

Washington DC

PANEL 1 REFLECTIONS ON THE NEW WORLD OF WORK

Remarks given by Ronnie L. Goldberg, Senior Counsel, USCIB and Deputy Vice-Chair, Business Technical Advisory Body on Labour Matters (CEATAL) to the IACML.

Many thanks to the authorities of Working Group 1 (Ministers of Labor of Brazil, Chile and Panama) for inviting me to participate on this Panel on the topic of the new world of work. I am honored to be included alongside representatives of the  ILO, OECD and IADB, as well as the representative of the Ministry of Chile and of course Marta Pujadas, President of COSATE.

The views that I will express are those of both CEATAL and the International Organization of Employers (IOE). CEATAL, business advisory body to the IACML, is composed of employer associations from each OAS member state. Through these organizations, CEATAL represents literally tens of thousands of small, medium and large private employers across the Americas.  The IOE, the world’s largest and most comprehensive business association with members in 142 countries, serves as the secretariat to CEATAL.

The new world of work is high on the agenda of CEATAL because business and employers’ organizations of the Americas are working to anticipate the realities that will confront their members and to provide well-constructed input to policy makers at the national, regional and international level. In common with most of the organizations and governments around this table, IOE has launched a discussion on the Future of Work, addressing many of the issues we are discussing today.

The impact of technology in the new world of work

During our own lifetimes, the context in which work is organized, distributed and performed has changed, irrevocably.  In his Report to the 2015 International Labor Conference, ILO DG Guy Ryder noted that change is taking place at such a speed and at such a scale as to constitute a real transformation of the world of work. A revolution.  We have had industrial and technological revolutions before.  They are disruptive, but they have historically resulted in the growth of economies and productivity, as well as the creation of new jobs. Despite short-term challenges resulting from the replacement of manual labor and the need to upscale skills and competencies, the pace of transformation has historically allowed enough time for education and training institutions to catch up, i.e. to appropriately prepare young people for careers and to equip low and mid-skilled workers with new skills and competencies to function productively. At the same time, population growth accelerated at a relatively consistent rate across the affected economies.

Today, things may be different.  Change is being fueled by technological advances taking place at unprecedented speed and undreamed of scope.  Many studies show that technology is replacing middle-level skills that were once considered uniquely human. With the new and affordable capabilities made possible by automation, a significant number of new job opportunities and new markets will be created. At the same time existing jobs will disappear or be re-designed. In short, widespread technological change are bringing about profound changes in the way we work.  Simultaneously, globalisation, and demographic trends, as well as new ways of organising the production of goods and delivery of services, are both providing a myriad of opportunities to society, and at the same time presenting considerable challenges.

To again quote Guy Ryder, “the debate about the (disruptive) effects of technological changes on jobs is some two centuries old, and the encouraging conclusion to be drawn from the historical record is that over the long term it has created more employment than it has destroyed, and has pushed overall living standards to new levels”. The question that none of us can answer is whether the current technological revolution that promises further applications in such areas as robotics, automation, 3D printing, is inherently different from what has been experienced in the past.

These are issues for all of us. Profound transformations have already taken place in the mature economies of North America.  Other regions of the continent are well placed to benefit from similar transformations.  They enjoy a young and numerous active population – more flexible and mobile, more technologically prepared, with greater participation by women, better educated, and more assertive – which is demanding infrastructure, health care, education, services, and opportunities for work and personal growth.

I can personally attest to this energy and potential in the region.  Last week I attended the OECD Digital Economy Ministerial in Cancun.  Among the collateral events was a Hackathon – a competition among more than 200 young people (nearly 40 percent young women) mostly from Mexico and elsewhere in Latin America, who divided themselves in teams and competed over a 24 hour period to develop innovative and useful apps. The winning apps were designed to facilitate the transfer of health information to emergency medical personnel, to improve security and independence for the visually impaired, and to make learning history a more immersive experience for teenagers. I took away several lessons from witnessing this phenomenon.  One was the vast potential of the digital economy to bring social benefits. A second is that these young people – the workforce of the future – have different expectations and aspirations for their careers than previous generations.  And a third is the importance of the major policy messages from the Ministerial: the need to preserve and extend the reach of an open Internet and the vital importance of training and education to meet the needs of the future and foster innovation and creativity.

What should we do about it?

History abounds with examples of attempts to resist innovation that should not so much be considered misguided or self-defeating, as simply impossible.

But progress can and must be shaped.  It is up to both developed and developing countries of the hemisphere not only to seize the opportunities but also to help those less willing or able to adapt to face the challenges:

One important element in shaping the future of work lies in labor market regulation. Regulations are essential for the proper functioning of labor markets. They can help correct market imperfections, support social cohesion and encourage economic efficiency. Labor market regulations cover a wide spectrum, from rules governing arrangements for individual contracts to mechanisms for collective bargaining. Evidence shows that labor market regulations can have an impact on a number of economic outcomes- including job creation, job flows, trends in productivity and the speed of adjustments to shocks. The negative effects of both under and over regulation are well documented. The challenge is to develop policies that avoid the extremes and effect a balance of flexibility with worker protection.

One aspect of the necessary flexibility in the new world of work has to do with flexible work arrangements. Self-employed and independent workers are growing in number and new forms of work are appearing (crowd working, teleworking, polling of workers, portfolio work, etc). The 2015 ILO Employment and Social Outlook estimates that fewer than 20 percent of the working population has a full-time open-ended contract. The variety of contractual arrangements continues to grow; employing workers on fixed term contracts to cover seasonal peaks in production, or for a one-off assignment, or to cover for maternity or long-term sick leave are all quite normal and accepted as the new “standard” everywhere.

Demonizing non-standard jobs, either overtly or by implication, ignores the ways in which they can benefit both workers and employers. Well-designed and regulated “non-standard forms of employment” can both protect workers and help enterprises by increasing their ability to respond and adapt to market demands. They can also be a mechanism for retaining and recruiting workers, for more quickly harnessing skills and expertise and most importantly – for Latin America and the Caribbean – for fighting informality. In addition, freely chosen employment in flexible arrangements permits better reconciliation of work, life and family responsibilities.  Looking to the future, we should respond to the new and changing demands of the labor market, by employing various complementary employment strategies and not simply by blocking the new, or trying to make the new fit into the old.

But as we all know, the future of work is not only about more flexible, short-term and transient forms of work but about completely new forms of work. There is every reason to believe that the platform approach begun in the taxi industry will spread to more and more sectors of the economy. At the moment, the platform economy represents a tiny part of even the U.S. economy.  But it will grow, and will inevitably have an impact on employment relationships, social security and tax systems, corporate regulations and generally on labor rights. Let me be clear: When employers speak about labor rights in this context we do not do so with the intention of undermining fundamental labor principles and rights at work, but rather with the intention of ensuring that these rights and standards are meaningful in new work environments that may be very different to the way work has been organized thus far.

The debate on the new world of work in the Americas is complex and diverse. Employers and workers alike are impacted by the rapid pace of change, and business, people, skills, career management and government policies, regulations and institutions will need to adapt to accommodate the new realities.

The challenges and opportunities are different from sub region to sub region and country to country, both for developing and developed countries of the Americas.

The debate will go on for years, in international and regional bodies, and in national governments.

To summarize:

We are facing the rise of more flexible, short-term and transient forms of work, as well as completely new forms of work and new models of business.

These transformations will impact an array of institutional and legal frameworks including social security, taxation systems, trade and investment. To be effective, institutional and legal frameworks should be coherent with an array of policies affecting labour markets. Policies on education, skills and training are essential elements of this package.

Such developments will also have a profound impact on the employment relationship. We will need to rethink this relationship and explore new ways to extend and administer social protection. Other aspects of regulation that will be affected concern health & safety, data protection, and hours of work.  We have a lot to do – and we have to do it together.

Employers are willing to provide credible input to policy makers and trade unions on how we can work together to prepare for the future. This is not only about companies and workers adapting to new technologies or accommodating the impact of social media. It is about transforming mindsets and attitudes towards work.

The Employers of the Americas are ready to bring their voice, experience and expertise to the table assisting the governments of the hemisphere.  Let me give four examples of areas in which we must collaborate:

  • Providing credible evidence based data. In Cancun, the OECD repeatedly made a plea for more and better information and statistics. This is essential for us  to better understand the trends and developments in the labor market and the drivers behind this change. Given the rise in not only flexible forms of work but also new forms of work, a first step is to define these arrangements.
  • Designing modern migration regulations and facilitating talent mobility and skills recognition.  One key feature of  the new world of work must be allowing workers to move across borders.
  • Adapting legal regulations and institutions to the new needs of business, the workforce and workplace. It is not for people to change to ensure that regulations work but regulations themselves need to change and adapt to the new context in order to support individuals. Regulations need also to facilitate the process, instead of being an obstacle to change.
  • Collaborating with schools and universities to develop a curricula and a shared practical knowledge of the market. The education system needs to change to allow a focus on new skills and lifelong learning.

There are many things we don’t know.  But of one thing we can be certain – we need to rethink and reform our education curricula and our training institutions to equip both children and the existing workforce for a future we can’t predict.  This must be a joint effort.

Thank you.

Business Calls on Governments to Ratify the Paris Agreement

Business&Climate_DanilovichThe second Business & Climate Summit – convened by a network of partners that represent over 6 million businesses worldwide – called for swifter government action on climate and the ratification of the Paris Agreement without further delay.

UK Secretary of State for Energy & Climate Change Amber Rudd MP addressed the Summit  reaffirming UK leadership on action against climate change despite the vote to leave the European Union.

“Climate change has not been downgraded as a threat,” she said. “It remains one of the most serious long term risks to our economic and national security […] as investors and businesses, you can be confident we remain committed to building a secure, affordable low carbon infrastructure fit for the 21st Century.”

The Business & Climate Summit – the annual gathering of leading global businesses and political leaders dedicated to climate action – met over two days (28-29 June) at London’s Guildhall, in the heart of the world’s leading international financial center, to address how business can, and should, continue to play a proactive role in reducing emissions and building a climate-resilient economy. Those already leading the way are putting climate action at the heart of their business strategy and reaping the economic benefits of doing so.

Achieving the goals of the Paris Agreement will require a major shift in investment away from traditional fossil fuel based energy intensive goods and services towards smarter, cleaner low carbon business models. To ensure that the objective of keeping global temperature increases well below 2°C remains possible and can be done in a way that minimizes economic disruption, this shift will have to happen immediately.

Following his role as Coordinator of the COP21 Business Dialogue, Gerard Mestrallet, Chairman, Paris EUROPLACE, Chairman, ENGIE, returned to this year’s Summit and said: “The first priority, I think, is setting carbon price signals everywhere, at levels that reflect the objectives Parties seek to achieve according to their National policies, or Regional policies, as for example for the EU ETS in Europe.”

The final day of the Summit, under the theme Finance, Innovation and Policy for The Low Carbon Transition, looked at the scale of action needed. It is estimated that $90 trillion needs to be invested globally in cities, land use and energy infrastructure – doubling current global annual infrastructure investment – between now and 2030 to help secure a low carbon, climate resilient economy.

Governments were urged to translate their ‘Nationally Determined Contributions’ into investment grade policy frameworks as soon as possible and to use carbon pricing as the most efficient way of achieving emission reduction targets.

Discussing low carbon finance and investment, Stuart Gulliver, Group Chief Executive Officer of HSBC, said: “Six months on from Paris we are much closer to being able to implement the terms of COP21 than we were at the start. The barriers to investment are lower, the call to action is louder and there is a clear willingness on the part of business and investors to change their ways and adapt their business models. Investors want to invest in sustainable projects and reduce the carbon footprint of their portfolios. With better standardisation, enhanced disclosure rules and better incentives for issuing green bonds, the COP21 goals can be met, but we must continue to work in unison and at pace with the public sector.”

Business recognizes that, with other non-state actors, it played an important role in securing the Paris Agreement and can play an equally important role in contributing to creating the policy frameworks conducive to long-term climate-resilient low carbon investments. Over the two days, the Summit heard from businesses all over the world, calling for swifter government action on climate and to work in partnership with business to achieve the necessary global policy framework.

During the final afternoon, the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) led an International Trade Plenary. Trade and climate change have an inextricable and intimate relationship. The Summit heard from business leaders and policymakers regarding the trade policy priorities required from a climate and green growth perspective, addressing the necessary action needed at the multilateral level as well as the possible role of bilateral and regional agreements. ICC Secretary General John Danilovich said: “Open markets are the best tool we have to enhance global welfare and enable climate action.”

At the beginning of the Summit, the We Mean Business coalition and CDP (formerly the Carbon Disclosure Project) launched a report, ‘The Business End of Climate Change’ with research analysis from the New Climate Institute. It examined five global initiatives on climate action and found that under current plans, business actions will reduce emissions by 3.7 billion metric tons of CO2 equivalent a year, or 60 percent of total emissions cuts pledged in Paris by countries’ NDCs. However, business emissions cuts could reach around 10 billion metric tons of CO2 equivalent a year, well over halfway to a sub 2°C world, with the right policy environment for enhanced climate action.

Business Sets Priorities for Education Policy

In response to the skills shortages many economies face, the Business and Industry Advisory Committee (BIAC) to the OECD released a Business Priorities for Educationpaper that calls for stronger cooperation among employers, policymakers, and education institutions.

“Our societies, and employers in particular, have a profound interest in ensuring that today’s and tomorrow’s job seekers are versatile, skilled, and employable,” commented Charles Fadel, Chair of the BIAC Education Committee. “They must be prepared to learn throughout their professional lives.”

Businesses therefore pay close attention to education policy. The competitiveness of companies, and the health of the societies in which they operate, hinge to a great extent on the talent and knowledge of employees.

The BIAC paper contributes chapters by thought leaders from national employer organizations and other education policy experts. Areas for action as identified in the paper include:

  • Curriculum and assessment reform
  • Entrepreneurial education
  • Teaching quality and school autonomy
  • Vocational education and training, and work-based learning
  • Innovation in education and higher education

Read Business Priorities for Education

Improving Opportunities for Women in the United States

Portrait of happy young businesswomanWomen’s economic opportunities have greatly improved in the United States over past decades; however, numerous challenges remain to further reduce gender inequalities. Continued progress will require reforms such as paid parental leave, flexible working arrangements, changes in job structure and remuneration, and increased access to quality pre-school and childcare.

Ronnie Goldberg, USCIB’s senior counsel, attended an event hosted by the OECD Washington Center titled “Improving Opportunities for Women in the United States.” The event highlighted the main findings of the OECD Economic Survey of the United States on improving opportunities for women, as well as provided a platform for high-level policymakers, researchers and business leaders to share what is being done by governments and the private sector to address gender inequalities in the workplace.

The discussion took place following the White House Summit on the United State of Women. Other speakers included OECD Secretary General Angel Gurría and U.S. Ambassador to the OECD Daniel Yohannes.

Goldberg spoke at a panel on “Championing better policies for women in the workplace,” in which she talked about what companies are doing to stop the “leaking pipeline” phenomenon in which women drop out at every successive management level, leading to severe under-representation of women in corporate leadership roles.

Read the OECD Economic Survey of the United States