Business Groups Urge Progress on Environmental Goods Agreement

Solar-workers_3As negotiations on an ambitious international climate agreement are underway in Paris this week, on December 1, the Coalition for Green Trade – of which USCIB is a co-chair – published a global industry letter calling for swift progress on the World Trade Organization’s Environmental Goods Agreement (EGA) ahead of the 10th WTO Ministerial Conference in Nairobi, Kenya later this month.

The EGA would eliminate tariffs on environmental goods and services, such as wind turbines, water treatment filters, and solar water heaters. Liberalizing trade on environmental goods would improve access to the technologies necessary for green growth. Negotiations on the EGA began in July 2014 among 13 economies and the European Union. Since then three more countries joined the agreement – Iceland, Israel and Turkey.

“Industries across the globe strongly endorse efforts to negotiate an EGA that is commercially significant, negotiated in a timely fashion, implementable and adequately flexible to accommodate and adjust to innovation,” stated the letter, signed by nearly 60 business organizations. “To this end, we call on negotiators to make substantial progress towards an ambitious outcome by the 10th Ministerial Conference of the WTO to be held in Nairobi, Kenya from 15 to 18 December 2015.”

The letter comes as trade officials gather in Geneva this week to negotiate an outcome ahead of the upcoming WTO ministerial.”  As negotiations move forward, USCIB and other associations will continue to an ambitious, high-standard, and forward-looking agreement.

 

Overview of the 2015 APEC Summit

AELM-family-photo-1Thousands of delegates from around the Pacific Rim gathered in the Philippines this month for the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation CEO Summit, the most influential and high-level economic dialogue in the region. The summit brings together heads of state, business leaders and economic experts to share their views on how to promote free trade, innovation, growth and integration in the Asia-Pacific.

APEC leaders released two statements following the conclusion of the CEO summit: the 23rd APEC Economic Leaders’ Declaration titled “Building Inclusive Economies, Building a Better World: A Vision for an Asia-Pacific Community” and a statement supporting the multilateral trading system on the occasion of the World Trade Organization’s 20th anniversary.

Throughout the year, USCIB participated in several APEC workstreams, including efforts on chemicals, advertising and global value chains. USCIB also noted the November 19 APEC leaders’ announcement of an initiative aimed at boosting services trade among all 21 APEC economies. Leaders also reaffirmed their objective of completing the Free Trade Area of the Asia-Pacific (FTAAP). 

We are pleased to see the following items USCIB worked on were highlighted in the Ministerial statement:

Global Value Chains

The APEC Leaders’ Declaration called for the development of policies that take full advantage of global value chains (GVCs) and encourage greater participation, competition, entrepreneurship and innovation through effective and comprehensive measures, including balanced intellectual property systems and capacity-building.

In August at the third APEC Senior Officials Meeting (SOMIII), USCIB participated in a half-day trade policy dialogue titled, “APEC Best Practices to Create Jobs and Increase Competitiveness,” which convened private-sector representatives and officials from the United States and the OECD for a discussion of the impacts of forced localization policies and how best trade practices can serve as sound alternatives to these policies. APEC ministers welcomed the results of the trade policy dialogue and instructed officials to continue to identify alternatives to localization policies and develop best practices as a means to foster job creation and increase competitiveness.

The declaration also noted progress in the APEC Strategic Blueprint for Promoting Global Value Chain Development and Cooperation as a promising avenue for growth, competitiveness and job creation in the region.

Chemicals

The APEC Chemical Dialogue recently undertook research to better understand divergences in the implementation of the Globally Harmonized System for Classification and Labeling of Chemicals (GHS). APEC leaders look forward to a report from the Chemical Dialogue in 2016 on the implementation of measures to reduce these divergences, and welcomed the work of the APEC regulatory community to strengthen capacity in the scientific assessment of metals and metal compounds, as well as the work of the Chemical Dialogue on Good Regulatory Practices.

At SOMIII in August, Helen Medina, USCIB’s vice president for product policy and innovation, represented member views at several meetings of the Chemical Dialogue. USCIB also brought to the table two new ideas at the Chemical Dialogue to help bolster regulatory cooperation and streamline customs procedures in the APEC region: 1) a self-certification customs form, in which an importer of goods would self-certify that their imports comply with the U.S. Toxic Substances and Control Act, and 2) a regional capacity-building project related to the theme of  “Analogue/Read-across use in Risk Assessment.”

Advertising

APEC leaders endorsed the Principles for Government’s Role in Promoting Effective Advertising Standards and instructed officials to advance work in this area in 2016. They also encouraged continued discussions on the implementation of the APEC Action Agenda on Advertising Standards and Practices.

APEC and the Future of Asia-Pacific Trade and Economic Growth

USCIB is an outreach partner for a December 14 event hosted by the Asia Society Policy Institute in New York about the future of the Asia-Pacific region’s economic growth. Registration and the event program are available on the Asia Society’s website.

Global Business Calls on G20 to Deliver on Growth and Employment

g20Business has called on world leaders gathering in Antalya, Turkey for the 2015 G20 Summit to commit to a four-point agenda to revitalize GDP growth and kick-start job creation across the world’s largest economies. USCIB members contributed to ongoing work by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), the International Organization of Employers (IOE) and the Business & Industry Advisory Committee to the OECD (BIAC) to inform the G20 process.

World leaders arrive in Antalya with the global economy at an apparent crossroads: GDP growth remains sluggish and youth unemployment stands at a record global average of over 13 percent. Worryingly, trade flows, which have historically been an important driver of growth and job creation, recorded an unanticipated 6 percent drop through the first half of this year.

Against this backdrop, CEOs from the ICC-led B20 International Business Advisory Council have outlined four key areas for urgent action:

  1. Ratify and implement the World Trade Organization’s Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA)
  2. Take concrete actions to create more opportunities for women and young people in the labor market
  3. Establish country-specific infrastructure strategies to boost investment in much needed infrastructure projects worldwide
  4. Improve SME access to finance

ICC has responded to the release of the G20 Leaders’ communiqué at the conclusion of the summit. Read more on the ICC’s website.

Addressing the G20 heads of state and government on Sunday BIAC Chairman Phil O’ Reilly called for structural reforms for dynamic and inclusive labor markets.

O’Reilly underlined the “pressing need” for the G20 heads of state and government to adopt predictable and productivity-enhancing structural policies, both in product and labor markets.

“What we are really talking about are policies that promote open and competitive markets for investment and trade, access to finance, a predictable regulatory environment, flexible labor markets and measures to support innovation and entrepreneurship,” said O’Reilly. He noted overriding need for business confidence to be strengthened in order for investment to flow.

With a focus on policies for job creation, O’Reilly identified the key areas the G20 Leaders had to address to stimulate private sector employment. Measures included removing barriers to starting, operating and growing a business; creating easy-to-understand, employment-friendly labor laws; promoting a variety of forms of employment to allow maximum opportunities for hiring; decreasing the burden of non-wage labor costs and creating an attractive regulatory framework for apprenticeship systems.

As the world looks ahead to the G20 presidency transferring to China for 2016, there was a clear message from the B20 that the Leaders could not take a business as usual approach to employment policy: “A sense of urgency must now underpin the implementation of the previous commitments of G20 governments,” O’Reilly concluded.

USCIB Weighs in on Future of Trade at OECD Global Trade Forum

Mulligan_trade_forum_copy
L-R: Joakim Reiter (UNCTAD) and Rob Mulligan (USCIB)

The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) held its global trade forum on November 3 in Paris, convening representatives from government, business and the OECD for a discussion on the prospects of future trade flows and the impact of government policy on economic growth.

Rob Mulligan, USCIB’s senior vice president for policy and government affairs, spoke on a panel at the global trade forum about alternative approaches to trade policies. He and other panelists discussed which polices will ensure that trade and investment continue to lead to growth and jobs. Other speakers on Mulligan’s panel included Ambassador Jonathan Fried, Canada’s representative to the World Trade Organization and Joakim Reiter, deputy secretary general of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD).

The day-long trade forum sought to take stock of changing global trade patterns and determine what can be done about the recent slowdown in trade growth. At the multilateral level, WTO negotiations remain stalled, while countries focus on regional and plurilateral initiatives to open markets among a smaller number of interested economies. The advent of the major emerging economies, as well as global value chains which have fragmented production around the world, have also contributed to dramatic shifts in trade patterns in recent decades.

Speaking on behalf of the Business and Industry Advisory Committee (BIAC) to the OECD and of USCIB member companies, Mulligan gave a business perspective on the future of trade.

“It is critical for governments to keep in mind the need for businesses to be adjusting, and often very quickly, in order to stay competitive and grow,” Mulligan said. “Government policies can have a significant impact on the moves by business positively or negatively.”

He explained that international companies have built global value chains to establish a framework for accessing foreign markets in a flexible and cost-efficient way. When constructing these global networks, companies consider a range of factors such as the potential market for their products, rule of law, strong infrastructure, skilled workforce and localization rules, and it is important for governments to understand how these factors drive the way companies pursue global markets.

Mulligan suggested that the same principles that the business community has advocated in the past will still apply in the future. Government should avoid unnecessary regulation, and when it is necessary, it should be designed as the least trade-restrictive approach that accomplishes the policy objective. He also stressed that governments should coordinate with each other to ensure that regulations are consistent across countries, as coherent regulatory regimes make it easier for companies to grow and create jobs.

USCIB Defends Investment Agreements at G20 Global Forum in Turkey

istanbul_source
Istanbul, Turkey

On October 5, USCIB Vice President for Investment and Financial Services Shaun Donnelly participated in a panel discussion in a day-long OECD/G20 Global Forum on International Investment in Istanbul.

Along with Donnelly, the following panelists made the case for strong investment chapters in international trade agreements, including investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS): Deputy U.S. Trade Representative Michael PunkeKurt Tong, principal deputy assistant secretary for the bureau of economic and business affairs at the Department of State; and Bernhard Welschke, secretary general of the Business and Industry Advisory Committee (BIAC) to the OECD.

“Other panelists, including from the EU and other foreign governments plus senior OECD staff, criticized  investment agreements, especially ISDS arbitration procedures,” said Donnelly. “Our ‘gang of four’ and a few other business panelists each in our own way made the case for strong investment agreements.”

Donnelly continued: “We’re counting on Ambassador Punke, representing USTR Michael Froman, to be a strong voice for strong, balanced Investment agreements along lines of U.S. Model Bilateral Investment Treaty.”

USCIB Welcomes Conclusion of Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiations

Golden_GateWashington, D.C., October 5, 2015 – The United States Council for International Business (USCIB) welcomed the conclusion of negotiations on the Trans-Pacific Partnership by TPP trade ministers meeting in Atlanta, saying that a comprehensive, market-opening TPP agreement would provide a significant boost to the U.S. and world economies.

“We have urged the conclusion of an ambitious, high-standard TPP throughout the course of these talks, and we look forward to reviewing details of the agreement to see if they meet these expectations,” said USCIB President and CEO Peter Robinson.” U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman and his counterparts are to be congratulated for seeing these talks through to their conclusion.”

Robinson continued: “Our future prosperity hinges on expanded trade, investment and job creation. Together, the TPP nations account for some 40 percent of global GDP, with a burgeoning middle class. And of course there is the added potential of other countries signing on now that a deal has been sealed.”

USCIB is a leading member of the U.S. Coalition for TPP, a broad-based group of U.S. companies and associations that supports the negotiation of a comprehensive, high-standard and commercially meaningful TPP agreement.

About USCIB:
USCIB promotes open markets, competitiveness and innovation, sustainable development and corporate responsibility, supported by international engagement and regulatory coherence. Its members include U.S.-based global companies and professional services firms from every sector of our economy, with operations in every region of the world. With a unique global network — encompassing the International Chamber of Commerce, International Organization of Employers, and the Business & Industry Advisory Committee to the OECD — USCIB provides business views to policy makers and regulatory authorities worldwide, and works to facilitate international trade and investment. More at www.uscib.org.

Contact:
Jonathan Huneke, USCIB
+1 212.703.5043, jhuneke@uscib.org

More on USCIB’s Trade and Investment Committee

ICC Banking Commission Global Survey Highlights Impact of Trade Finance Gap on SMEs

Cover Page ICC Global Survey on Trade Finance 2015_sourceThe International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) Banking Commission has released the results from its 2015 Global Survey on trade finance – highlighting the impact of the trade finance gap on SMEs, the impact of regulation on correspondent banking, as well as positive trade finance trends, particularly with regards to export finance.

Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) are among the hardest-hit by the trade finance gap, reports the Global Survey on trade finance, released on September 29 by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) Banking Commission. The Survey received 482 responses from 112 countries around the world and showed that SMEs account for nearly 53 percent of all rejected trade finance transactions. By contrast, 79 percent of the trade finance transactions for larger businesses are accepted.

The trade finance gap is highlighted throughout the Survey, citing compliance as a chief barrier to trade finance. Nearly 46 percent of the banks surveyed terminated correspondent relationships due to the cost or complexity of compliance, while 70 percent of respondents reported declining transactions due to AML/KYC requirements. Furthermore, the percentage of respondents citing anti-financial crimes compliance requirements as a significant impediment to trade finance has increased from 69 percent last year, to 80 percent in this year’s Survey. This trend is expected to continue, as nearly all (93%) of respondents expect compliance requirements to increase during 2015.

“The Global Survey works as a snapshot of market trends, allowing us to compare progress from previous years and gauge global expectations,” said Vincent O’Brien, chair of the ICC Banking Commission Market Intelligence. “This year that snapshot has highlighted the severity of the trade finance gap – which continues to be impacted by regulation, despite the low-risk nature of trade finance – and particularly its impact on SMEs. This is crucial given SMEs constitute over 95 percent of all firms and account for approximately 60 percent of employment worldwide.”

That said, the results from the Survey also show some positive trends in trade finance. Around 63 percent of respondents reported an increase in overall trade finance activity, with 61 percent of banks stating they have increased their capacity to meet trade finance. What’s more, 25 percent of respondents to the Global Survey on trade finance consider trade instruments supporting trade as involving more than 75 percent less inherent risk than conventional lending.

The results from the Global Survey also reflected positively on export finance, with 79 percent of respondents in the industry claiming it remains a profitable business. The industry also observed a significant decrease in pricing, and even more so, fees in 2014.

“While the trade finance industry is certainly facing challenges, and the trade finance gap is a clear issue, the results from the Global Survey on trade finance show that it is not all doom and gloom,” added O’Brien. “The financial landscape is recognizing the importance of trade and, in addition to banks stating they have increased capacity to meet trade finance, we have an array of alternative lenders – such as specialist financiers, export credit agencies, and multilateral development banks – stepping up to fill the trade finance gap.”

Daniel Schmand, chair of the ICC Banking Commission, said: “New players can prove their worth by addressing the shortfall of trade finance; new or alternative financiers may support trade in areas where banks are restricted by risk appetites, regulatory burdens or stakeholder concerns.”

Download the 2015 ICC Global Trade and Finance Survey.

USCIB Statement on China’s WTO Commitments

china_flag_largeThe economic relationship between the United States and China is both vital and complex, and U.S. business holds an important stake in this relationship’s success. Since China joined the World Trade Organization in 2001, the United States Trade Representative has submitted a yearly report to Congress on China’s compliance and commitments to its WTO accession. As part of this submission, USCIB is invited to provide a statement to USTR on behalf of its members, providing feedback, comments and recommendations on China’s compliance with its WTO commitments.

USCIB appreciates the significant efforts China has made since joining the WTO to meet its obligations under the terms of its accession agreement. However, there still remain general WTO obligation compliance concerns. Broad business concerns are listed below, excerpted from USCIB’s statement:

China’s Antimonopoly Law (AML): Chinese antitrust enforcement authorities continue to use the AML as a tool to advance industrial policies goals and limit competition by U.S. and other foreign companies. While we support China’s efforts to address anti-competitive practices, Chinese regulators have repeatedly used AML enforcement against U.S. companies absent any proof of market power or anti-competitive harm, and often in disregard of basic norms of fairness, due process, and transparency. USCIB members urge the U.S. government to continue to focus on this issue and its effects on U.S. companies.

National Treatment and Non-Discrimination: Chinese authorities continue to use a variety of policy tools and regulatory measures—including AML enforcement (described above), technology standards policies, IPR enforcement practices, and licensing and investment reviews—to compel transfer of U.S. IP or technologies to Chinese entities at below-market rates and to exclude U.S. companies from full and equal participation in the Chinese market. USCIB members continue to call on China to abide by their WTO commitments of national treatment and non-discrimination and ensure a competitive market that allows for foreign business participation on a level playing field with domestic Chinese firms.

IT Security Measures: Chinese policymakers and regulators have recently proposed or enacted a variety of trade-restrictive and discriminatory requirements on information technology (IT) under the guise of protecting security. These measures, many of which require the use of IT products that are “secure and controllable,” disadvantage U.S. firms by requiring Chinese IT users to purchase Chinese products or suppliers, imposing domestic R&D or content requirements, requiring the transfer or disclosure of source code or other IP, restricting cross-border data transfers, and in other ways. USCIB members urge the U.S. government to continue to press for full suspension of all existing and proposed measures involving trade-restrictive requirements in this area.

Read USCIB’s full statement on China’s WTO commitments.

 

BIAC-B20 Event: Financing SMEs in Global Markets

Charles R. Johnston, chair of USCIB's Trade and Investment Committee and Vice Chair of BIAC
Charles R. Johnston, chair of USCIB’s Trade and Investment Committee and Vice Chair of BIAC

Conscious of the financing challenge facing small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and the consequences for growth and investment, the Business and Industry Advisory Committee to the OECD (BIAC) and B20 Turkey hosted a special event on Business Access to Global Value Chains and Financing SMEs on June 4, 2015 at the OECD Headquarters in Paris. Participants included senior representatives from SME associations, financial firms, multinational companies, governments, international organizations, and business federations. The event sought to pave the way for actions to support SMEs in global value chains (GVCs), in contribution to the G20 Leaders’ Summit in November 2015.

As national economies endure the slowest post-crisis global investment recovery since the early 1970s, there is a pressing need to unlock growth, investment and jobs. More must be done to enable businesses to serve their clients through GVCs, which form the centerpiece of world trade and investment, and thereby enhance companies’ competitiveness, productivity, and propensity to invest.

However, SMEs – which account for about 60 to 70 percent of employment and over 50 percent of value-added in OECD countries – have struggled to access the financing they require to participate in and across world markets, as banks have deleveraged to meet new regulatory requirements.

Following the event, BIAC and B20 Turkey released a publication to convey key priorities to the G20 agenda in 2015. It presents a compilation of chapters by prominent thinkers on the financing of SMEs in GVCs, and draws upon the discussions held at the special event held on June 4. The final chapter of the publication presents three overarching recommendations to G20 Leaders:

  1. Focus on coordination, consultation and impact assessment
  2. Raise SME access to finance and skills through an integrated approach
  3. Maximize the sharing of information through digital platforms

The publication is intended to serve as a key point of reference in preparing the G20 Leaders’ Summit Communiqué in 2015. The publication is below for your perusal.

BIAC and B20 give appreciation to the following co-sponsors of the event and report: Lloyds Banking Group, Toronto-Dominion Bank Group, the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA), the SME Finance Forum, and Willis Ltd.

More Effort Needed on Trade for Jobs and Growth, ICC leaders say

New Delhi
New Delhi

The shrinkage in global trade flows over the first two quarters of 2015 was highlighted as a major concern for global business by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), at its executive board meeting in New Delhi, India on September 16.

Discussing strategic priorities for the international business community, ICC leaders called for a major push to ensure the potential benefits of the WTO’s Trade Facilitation Agreement are realized. This agreement, concluded in 2013, has significant potential to boost global trade flows, up to an estimated $1 trillion over time.

“The TFA has significant potential to support the recovery of global trade flows, by making it easier, quicker and less costly to export,” said ICC and USCIB Chairman Terry McGraw. “Ratifying the TFA must be the starting point for a concerted effort to promote trade as a driver of growth.”

Comprising CEO’s and business leaders from over 20 countries, executive board members discussed a core work program for ICC focusing on four major summits – each of which is expected to have a major impact on business for years to come. Specifically, the 10th Ministerial meeting of the World Trade Organization in Nairobi, the UN Sustainable Development Goals Summit in New York, the G20 leaders Summit in Antalya and the landmark Climate Conference, COP21, in Paris.

The TFA tops a list of four priorities set out by the Business-20 International Business Advisory Council (IBAC), established under this year’s Turkish presidency. The executive board endorsed the IBAC priorities that also include financing for small- and medium-sized enterprises, youth and women’s engagement in the labor force and infrastructure investment.

“We as businesses can’t generate jobs and growth without government support,” McGraw said. “As the voice of business with representation in over 130 countries we are ready to do all we can in the weeks ahead to promote the G20 agenda for growth, jobs and opportunity.”

ICC Executive Board members met in Delhi on the eve of the 2015 India Economic Convention.

Read more: Our 5 takeaways from the India Economic Convention 2015