2015 OECD International Tax Conference: Background Documents

BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS

BEPS Action Plan – Overview

OECD: Addressing BEPS

OECD: Action Plan on BEPS

BIAC Statement of Tax Principles for International Business

BIAC Statement of Tax Best Practices for Engaging with Tax Authorities in Developing Countries

BEPS Discussion Drafts

Current

Past

BEPS 2014 Deliverables

2014 Deliverables

G20 Report on the Impact of BEPS in Low Income Countries

Part 1

Part 2

BEPS Implementation Package February 2015

Action 15

Action 13

Action 5

BIAC and USCIB Comments on BEPS

BIAC

June 2015**
BIAC Comments on the OECD Discussion Draft on BEPS Actions 8: Revisions to Chapter VIII of the Transfer Pricing Guidelines on Cost Contribution Arrangements (CCAs)

May 2015:
BIAC Comments on the OECD Discussion Draft on BEPS Action 3: Strengthening CFC Rules

BIAC Comments on the OECD Discussion Draft on Action 11/ Improving the Analysis of BEPS

BIAC Comments on the OECD Discussion Draft on BEPS Actions 8-10: Revisions to Chapter I of the Transfer Pricing Guidelines (including Risk, Recharacterisation and Special Measures)

April 2015
on the OECD Discussion Draft on BEPS Action 12: Mandatory Disclosure Rules

February 2015
BIAC Comments on the OECD Discussion Draft on BEPS Action 10: The Use of Profit Splits in the Context of the Global Value Chains

BIAC Comments on the OECD Discussion Draft on BEPS Action 10: Transfer Pricing Aspects of Commodities Transactions

BIAC Comments on the OECD Discussion Draft on BEPS Action 4: Interest Deductions and Other Financial Payments

January 2015
BIAC Comments on the OECD Discussion Draft on Action 14: Make Dispute Resolution Mechanisms more Effective

BIAC Comments on the OECD Discussion Draft on BEPS Action 10: Proposed Modifications to Chapter VII to the Transfer Pricing Guidelines Relating to Low Value-Adding Intra-Group Services

BIAC Comments on the OECD Discussion Draft on BEPS Action 7: Preventing the Artificial Avoidance of Permanent Establishment Status

BIAC Comments on the OECD Discussion Draft on BEPS Action 6: Preventing Treaty Abuse

September 2014
OECD’s Request for Input on BEPS Action 11: Establish methodologies to collect and analyze data on BEPS and the actions to address it

April 2014
BIAC Comments on the OECD Discussion Draft on BEPS Action 1: Tax Challenges of the Digital Economy

BIAC Comments on the OECD Discussion Draft on Transfer Pricing Comparability and Developing Countries

BIAC Comments on the OECD Discussion Draft on BEPS Action 6: Preventing the Granting of Treaty Benefits in Inappropriate Circumstances

February 2014
BIAC Comments in response to the OECD Discussion Draft addressing Transfer Pricing Documentation and Country by Country Reporting submitted to OECD (Appendix)

October 2013
BIAC letter to Mike Williams and Pascal Saint-Amans on BEPS

April 2013
BIAC Comments on the February 2013 OECD Report on BEPS

 

USCIB

May 2015**
USCIB Comment Letter on the OECD Discussion Draft on BEPS Actions 8: Revisions to Chapter VIII of the Transfer Pricing Guidelines on Cost Contribution Arrangements (CCAs)

April 2015
USCIB Comment Letter on the OECD Discussion Draft on BEPS Action 3: Strengthening CFC Rules

USCIB Comment Letter on the OECD Discussion Draft on BEPS Action 12: Mandatory Disclosure Rules

February 2015
USCIB Comment Letter on the OECD Discussion Draft on BEPS Action 4: Interest Deductions and Other Financial Payments

USCIB Comment Letter on the OECD Discussion Draft on BEPS Actions 8, 9, and 10: Discussion Draft on Revisions to Chapter 1 of the Transfer Pricing Guidelines (Including Risk, Recharacterisation and Special Measures)

USCIB Comment Letter on the OECD Discussion Draft on BEPS Action 10: Discussion Draft on the use of Profit Splits in the Context of Global Value Chains

January 2015
USCIB Comment Letter on the OECD Discussion Draft on BEPS Action 14: Make Dispute Resolution Mechanisms More Effective

USCIB Comment Letter on the OECD Discussion Draft on Follow Up Work on BEPS Action 6: Preventing Treaty Abuse

USCIB Comment Letter on the OECD Discussion Draft on BEPS Action 7: Prevent the Artificial Avoidance of PE Status

December 2014
USCIB Comment Letter on the OECD Discussion Draft on BEPS Action 10: Proposed Modifications to Chapter VII of the Transfer Pricing Guidelines Relating to Low Value-Adding Intra-Group Services

September 2014
USCIB Comment Letter OECD’s Request for Input on BEPS Action 11: Establish methodologies to collect and analyze data on BEPS and the actions to address it

May 2014
USCIB Comment Letter on the OECD Discussion Draft on BEPS Action 2: Neutralise the effects of Hybrid Mismatch Arrangements (Recommendations for Domestic Laws)

April 2014
USCIB Comment Letter on the OECD Discussion Draft on BEPS Action 2: Neutralise the Effects of Hybrid Mismatch Arrangements (Treaty Issues)

USCIB Response to the OECD’s Discussion Draft on the Tax Challenges of the Digital Economy (the Discussion Draft)

USCIB Comment Letter on the OECD Discussion Draft on Transfer Pricing Comparability Data and Developing Countries

USCIB Comment Letter on the OECD Discussion Draft on BEPS Action 6: Preventing the Granting of Treaty Benefits in Inappropriate Circumstances

February 2014
USCIB Comments on the OECD Discussion Draft on Transfer Pricing Documentation and Country-by Country Reporting

Panelist Materials

“Cross-Border Tax Problems of Investment Funds” by Kim Blanchard

 

**Not included on USB

www.uscibtax.org

US Treasury pressures Tony Abbott to drop ‘Google tax’

Australian Financial Review – April 28, 2015

The Obama administration is pressuring the government of Australian Prime Minister Tony Abbott to back away from plans to target American technology multinationals with higher taxes in next month’s federal budget. USCIB’s Carol Doran Klein is quoted.

US Treasury pressures Tony Abbott to drop ‘Google tax’

The 2015 OECD International Tax Conference

OECD Tax Conference Banner 2015

REGISTRATION NOW OPEN!

The 2015 OECD International Tax Conference

Draft Agenda

Four Seasons Hotel, Washington D.C
June 10-11, 2015

The OECD, USCIB and BIAC, in cooperation with IFA-USA, ITPF, NFTC, OFII, TCPI, TEI and Tax Foundation, will host a conference on the OECD’s new international taxation initiatives on June 10-11, 2015 in Washington, D.C. This conference provides a unique opportunity for the U.S. business community to interact directly with key representatives from the OECD’s Center for Tax Policy and Administration and senior tax officials from the U.S. and other key countries involved in the OECD/G-20 BEPS Project.

Key Topics:

Base Erosion and Profit Shifting including:

  • U.S. Tax Reform and BEPS
  • Transfer Pricing – Aligning Returns with Value Creation
  • Dispute Resolution
  • Interest Deductibility and CFC Rules
  • Permanent Establishments
  • Treaty Abuse
  • Life After BEPS

Featured Speakers:

  • Mr. Masatsugu Asakawa – Chair of the OECD Committee on Fiscal Affairs, Deputy Vice Minister for Policy Planning and Co-ordination, Ministry of Finance, Japan
  • Pascal Saint-Amans – Director of the Center for Tax Policy & Administration, OECD
  • Grace Perez-Navarro – Deputy Director of the CTPA, OECD
  • Marlies de Ruiter – Head of Tax Treaty, Transfer Pricing, and Financial Transactions Division, OECD
  • Achim Pross – Head of International Cooperation and Tax Administration, OECD
  • Andrew Hickman – Head of Transfer Pricing Unit, OECD
  • Senior Treasury and Foreign Tax Policy Officials

For more information, please contact Erin Breitenbucher (202-682-7465 or ebreitenbucher@uscib.org).

For information on how you can become a sponsor of the 2015 conference, please contact Abby Shapiro (617-515-8492 (mobile) / 212-703-5064 or ashapiro@uscib.org)

Registration

2015 Draft Agenda

2014 Agenda

2015 Hotel Room Block

More on USCIB’s Taxation Committee

2015 Conference Sponsored By:

Deloitte

EY

PWC

 

ExxonMobil

Grant Thornton

KPMG

Miller Chevalier

Print

 

 

Presented by:

USCIB logo
OECD
biac-logo-cut

In association with:

IFA
ITPF
NFTC
Organization for International Investment
TCPI
Tax Executives Institute, Inc.
Tax Foundation

Business Emphasizes Dispute Resolution at OECD Tax Consultations

OECD public consultation meetings on the Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) Project took place in Paris from January 21-23, 2015, where a number of key issues for business including Permanent Establishment (PE) Status (BEPS Action 7), Treaty Abuse (BEPS Action 6), Low Value-Adding Services (BEPS Action 10), and Dispute Resolution (BEPS Action 14), were addressed among business governments and NGOs.

BEPS refers to the G20/OECD initiative designed to rewrite global tax rules to prevent incidences of perceived under- or non-taxation of international companies.

At the consultations, BIAC Tax Committee Chair Will Morris emphasized the absolute importance of effective dispute resolution to a successful outcome for the BEPS Project. He also underlined the need for clarity in guidance regarding all BEPS outcomes. February consultations will address Interest Deductions (Action 4) and VAT B2C Guidelines (Action 1).

Carol Doran Klein, USCIB’s vice president for international tax counsel, participated in the OECD Public Consultation, representing U.S. business interests in BIAC’s work.

In support of its strategy to deepen developing countries’ engagement in the BEPS Project, OECD will also be organizing regional consultations during February and March in Peru, Korea, Turkey, Gabon and South Africa.  BIAC is submitting written responses to all BEPS Discussion Drafts.

USCIB Assails UKs Catch-22 Move to Tax Non-Resident Companies

competitiveness2New York, N.Y., December 15, 2014 – The United States Council for International Business (USCIB) condemned proposed UK rules to impose a new tax on so-called “diverted profits,” saying the measure would, if implemented, have a major impact on U.S.-based multinational companies.

The rules, contained in UK Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne’s Autumn Statement, propose a new tax on diverted profits. Among other things, the proposed rules would impose a new tax on non-resident companies selling goods and services to UK customers by penalizing non-resident companies for avoiding a UK permanent establishment (“PE”).

“The UK’s proposal jumps the gun on ongoing discussions concerning the scope of taxation rights on non-resident companies,” said USCIB Vice President and International Tax Counsel Carol Doran Klein. “USCIB believes that the UK’s unilateral assertion of the right to tax so-called diverted profits is an undisguised attempt to bring more tax revenue into the UK, whether consistent with international norms or not.”

Klein said the UK move would undercut discussions in the 34-nation Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) to develop rules on base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS). The BEPS project, which seeks to address growing concerns over non-taxation of certain cross-border operations and transactions by multinational firms, is examining a wide range of international tax rules, including those on permanent establishment.

“The goal of the multilateral discussions on BEPS is to reach consensus solutions to identified international tax issues,” Klein stated. “Unilateral assertions of taxing jurisdiction by any countryincrease the risk that other countries will simply abandon the process and act unilaterally. Such actions increase the likelihood of double taxation on companies, which will have a negative effect on cross-border trade and investment.”

The diverted profits tax PE rule would apply if a non-UK resident is: carrying on activity in the UK in connection with supplies of goods or services made by the non-resident company to customers in the UK without becoming subject to the UK corporate income tax;the UK tax authorities believe the non-resident is deliberately trying to avoid PE status; the non-resident’s total tax is reduced; and the company is large (sales of more than 10 million pounds in the UK).

This proposal would greatly expand UK taxing rights of non-resident companies that currently do not have sufficient presence in the UK to be subject to the regular corporate income tax, according to Klein. “Because the diverted profits tax applies when a UK nonresident does not have a PE and is imposed at a higher rate, companies will be encouraged to increase their UK presence to become subject to the regular corporate income tax,” she said. “That is, they would increase investment within the UK to pay more tax at the regular rate or pay the diverted profits tax at the higher rate on profits that will be subjectively determined by HMRC. That’s the Catch-22. “

Klein said the proposal would clearly override existing tax treaties and cause harmful double taxation. “It is intended to apply when there is no PE under the relevant rules,” she said. “Companies should be free to structure their affairs taking into account the rules as they are. If they do not have a PE under those rules, then they should not be subject to tax on their business profits. Countries should not be able to disregard agreed-upon rules simply because they do not like the outcome.

About USCIB:

USCIB promotes open markets, competitiveness and innovation, sustainable development and corporate responsibility, supported by international engagement and regulatory coherence. Its members include U.S.-based global companies and professional services firms from every sector of our economy, with operations in every region of the world. With a unique global network encompassing the International Chamber of Commerce, the International Organization of Employers and the Business and Industry Advisory Committee to the OECD, USCIB provides business views to policy makers and regulatory authorities worldwide, and works to facilitate international trade and investment. More at www.uscib.org.

More on USCIB’s Taxation Committee